OOF-AII-340364

Security Robot Rolls Over Child in Mall

On July 7, 2016, a Knightscope K5 autonomous security robot collided with a 16-month old boy while patrolling the Stanford Shopping Center in Palo Alto, CA.

Event date
2016-07-12
Country
United States of America
Severity
Low
Evidence state
Single-source

Assessment status

Generated from available public incident evidence using OOF® governance methodology. It is not an official investigation, legal determination, regulatory finding, certification, or OOF® Approved Assessment.

View source record from AI Incident Database (Responsible AI Collaborative)

Assessment confidence dimensions

Source corroboration
Single-source

Measures source-group corroboration only; it does not establish factual truth.

Extraction completeness
High

Measures populated source fields after deterministic normalization; it does not measure correctness.

Methodological assignment confidence
Moderate

Measures automated assignment support; substantive correctness requires authorized human review.

Known facts from the incident record

  • The incident record identifies the event date as 2016-07-12.
  • The incident record identifies the location as United States of America.

Reported claims

  • On July 7, 2016, a Knightscope K5 autonomous security robot collided with a 16-month old boy while patrolling the Stanford Shopping Center in Palo Alto, CA.

Material unknowns

  • Independent corroboration is not established in the available incident record.

Primary governance problem

The incident appears to expose a governance problem involving autonomous, execution. Available reporting supports preliminary methodological interpretation, not a finding of fault or non-compliance.

Architecture intelligence

Preliminary governance questions

  • How should autonomous, execution be governed in the conditions described by the available incident evidence?
  • What operational authority and controls applied to Stanford Shopping Center at the relevant time?
  • What evidence would establish how yes produced or enabled the reported outcome?
  • What additional independent evidence is required to resolve the material evidence gaps?

Evidence gaps and limitations

  • Only one independent source group is represented; corroboration is not established.
  • AI technology is not specified in the source record.

Return to the public incident index