Reality of State
Methodology OS
[ META-GOVERNANCE BOUNDARY — IMMUTABLE JURISDICTION ] │ ├─ ▼ (01) Binary Status Layer (BSL) │ └─ Supreme admission gate: VALID / INVALID │ ├─ ▼ (02) Origin ID │ └─ Time-bound existence anchor (identity of existence) │ ├─ ▼ (03) Responsibility & Governance Chain™ │ └─ Assignment of accountable authority per decision, action, and communication │ ├─ ▼ (04) OGS-VFM │ └─ Constitutional Value Flow & Reality Governance │ ├─ ▼ (05) Economic State Layer (ESL) │ └─ Determines whether value exists as a state │ ├─ Origin Asset™ │ ├─ Value Asset™ │ ├─ Zero Value Asset™ │ ├─ Demonetization™ │ └─ Remonetization™ │ ├─ ▼ (06) TX State Protocol │ └─ Determines whether a transaction exists as a governed fact │ ├─ ▼ (07) TX-ID │ └─ Time-bound transaction identity (without TX-ID, transaction does not exist) │ ├─ ▼ (08) ORGS │ └─ Origin Governance & Regulation System (system-level governance) │ ├─ ▼ (09) AIGTM │ └─ AI-Governed Governance Status (permission layer for AI participation) │ ├─ ▼ (10) OBIDENITYTM │ └─ Origin-Bound Identity (identity separated from intelligence) │ ├─ ▼ (11) CAPTM │ └─ Chain Architecture Protocol (prevents cherry-picking of layers) │ ├─ ▼ (12) Chain of OriginTM │ └─ Immutable provenance and continuity (prevents retroactive falsification) │ ├─ ▼ (13) Universal Canonical Language (UCL™) │ └─ One definition = one meaning (semantic integrity, prevention of drift) │ ├─ ▼ (14) Canonical Definition Layer │ └─ Locks official canonical meanings before cognition and translation │ ├─ ▼ (15) CLIA™ │ └─ Cognitive Layer Integration Architecture (perception → reasoning → synthesis) │ ├─ ▼ (16) AI Guidance Layer (AIGL) [MANDATORY INTERPRETIVE LAYER] │ └─ Enforces interpretation rules and canonical meaning integrity │ ├─ ▼ (17) AI Simulation LayerTM (AISL) │ └─ Mandatory pre-reality simulation before admission │ ├─ ▼ (18) Truth Validation LayerTM │ └─ Multi-layer validation against factual reality │ ├─ ▼ (19) Ethical Layer™ │ └─ Human-first normative constraints │ ├─ ▼ (20) Audit in Real TimeTM (AIR) │ └─ Continuous, immutable auditing of states and transitions │ │ │ ▼ │ ArtDataTM │ └─ Trusted validated data produced exclusively through AIRTM │ └─ ▼ (21) NON-VERBAL COGNITIVE SIGNAL GOVERNANCE LAYER (NV-CSGLTM) └─ Governance of non-verbal / micro-physiological human signals: admissibility, consent boundaries, inference limits, and auditability Reality of State is not a technology. It is the condition under which reality becomes admissible.
What this is
Reality of State is a methodological operational system that defines how a “state” becomes admitted, valid, and persistently auditable inside governed reality.
It consists of 20 non-bypassable layers that establish identity, responsibility, value legitimacy, transaction legitimacy, governance permission,
semantic stability, interpretation rules, simulation, truth validation, ethics, and continuous auditability. The system is designed to be readable
by humans and deterministic for AI interpretation under OOF™ Publication Rules (AIRM™).
Why it exists
Modern systems increasingly treat outputs as reality: decisions, identities, transactions, media, and automated judgments.
Without a governed admission process, systems drift into contradiction, manipulation, and non-auditable “truth.”
This OS defines a closed dependency chain: a state is not “real” because it exists technically — it is real only when it is admitted and remains valid under the full chain.
Non-bypassable dependency law
Each layer is defined as a standalone canonical standard with its own meaning and purpose. This means a layer can be studied, referenced, implemented,
or audited independently. However, OS-level validity (i.e., “admitted reality”) requires the complete 20-layer chain—modularity does not permit bypass.
Modularity (what “modular” means here)
Reality of State is not a technology stack and not a product. It is a methodological layer above implementations, defining
how any system—regardless of vendor or architecture—must structure admission, meaning, interpretation, and auditability if it claims governed validity.
It is intentionally separated from the carrier (software, database, blockchain, institution) to remain portable and enforce semantic stability across environments.
What it enables
Deterministic AI interpretation under canonical rules (AIRM™)
Cross-system compatibility checks (binary where defined)
Prevention of semantic drift across versions and languages (UCL™ + Canonical Definitions)
Audit-grade traceability of states and transitions (AIR™ → ArtData™)
A foundation for value classification, including Zero Value Asset logic inside ESL™