INTEGROS — Integrity Standard

OOF™ Origin Open Foundation™

Independent Methodological Authority

OriginID: OOF-OID-GOV-INTEGROS-2026-03-05-0001
Category: Governance & Enforcement
Subcategory: Integrity Governance Frameworks
Type: Infrastructure-Level Integrity Standard
Version: 2.0
Status: Canonical · Open Standard
Effective Date: 19 March 2026

Compatibility:
OOF Methodology OS
MTVF
EVIP
ORGS (OGS-VFM Level 0)

Authority: OOF™ Origin Open Foundation™
Protection: MIP™ — Methodological Intellectual Property
Canonical Language: English (UCL™)

Canonical Definition

INTEGROS defines the non-bypassable conditions under which
systems maintain integrity, traceability, and verifiability
across operation.

Integrity means: a system cannot be modified, manipulated,
or bypassed without detection.

If integrity cannot be enforced, the system cannot be
considered valid.

A. Standard Abstract

INTEGROS operates as the infrastructure-level integrity layer
within the OOF Methodology OS.

Without integrity, no system can be considered reliable,
governable, or valid.

The objective is to ensure that:

system behavior is traceable
system logic is consistent
manipulation is detectable
verification is always possible

Integrity is not a feature.
It is a precondition for system existence.

B. Core Principle

Integrity must exist before any system can be trusted
or operated.

C. Core Integrity Conditions

All conditions MUST be present simultaneously.

C.1 — Traceability

Category: Core Integrity Condition
Type: Record & Attribution Requirement

All integrity-relevant actions MUST be:

recorded
attributable
time-linked
reconstructable

C.2 — Structural Consistency

Category: Core Integrity Condition
Type: Consistency & Change Control Requirement

System rules MUST:

remain consistent across time
record all changes
detect all deviations

C.3 — Verification Capability

Category: Core Integrity Condition
Type: Auditability Requirement

The system MUST allow:

independent verification
auditability
integrity validation

C.4 — Manipulation Detection

Category: Core Integrity Condition
Type: Detection Requirement

The system MUST detect:

unauthorized modification
data manipulation
process bypass

C.5 — Integrity State Transparency

Category: Core Integrity Condition
Type: State Definition Requirement

The system MUST define observable states:

valid
compromised
restored

C.6 — Chain of Control

Category: Core Integrity Condition
Type: Authority & Responsibility Requirement

The system MUST maintain:

traceable authority
defined responsibility
controlled transitions

D. Prohibited Condition

No system may operate or claim validity if actions are
not traceable, manipulation cannot be detected,
or behavior cannot be verified.

Any undetectable modification invalidates system integrity.

E. Scope

Applicable to:

data systems
operational processes
system architectures
environmental systems
AI systems

F. System Position

INTEGROS functions as the foundational integrity layer
of the OOF system architecture.

All other standards depend on its conditions.

Without integrity, no higher-level system function
can be considered valid.

G. Compatibility Statement

A system may declare:

"INTEGROS Compatible"

only if all conditions are continuously satisfied.

Structural Architecture

INTEGROS — Integrity Standard
        │
        ├── C.1 — Traceability
        ├── C.2 — Structural Consistency
        ├── C.3 — Verification Capability
        ├── C.4 — Manipulation Detection
        ├── C.5 — Integrity State Transparency
        └── C.6 — Chain of Control

Canonical Closing Statement

If integrity cannot be verified, it does not exist.

INTEGROS® –Modules

→ DCM — Delegation Chain Module
→ SGM — Skill Governance Module
→ RAM — Runtime Authority Module
→ KRM — Kill / Revoke Module
→ ACM — Audit Continuity Module
→ OIB — Organizational Information Boundary Module

About the INTEGROS® — Integrity Standard
INTEGROS® — Minimum Implementation Framework
INTEGROS® — Self-Declaration Framework
OOF Compatibility — INTEGROS® Standard
INTEGROS® Integrity Stack