Kill / Revoke Module (KRM)
OOF™ Origin Open Foundation™
Independent Methodological Authority
OriginID: OOF-OID-GOV-INTEGROS-KRM-2026-04-10-0004
Category: Governance & Enforcement
Subcategory: Integrity Governance Frameworks
Type: Safety & Enforcement Module
Parent Standard: INTEGROS® — Integrity Standard
Version: 1.0
Status: Canonical · Open Module
Effective Date: 10 April 2026
Compatibility:
INTEGROS® · CGRM · RTI · MTVF · EVIP · ORGS (OGS-VFM Level 0)
Authority: OOF™ Origin Open Foundation™
Protection: MIP™ — Methodological Intellectual Property
Canonical Language: English (UCL™)
Canonical Definition
Kill / Revoke defines the non-bypassable conditions under whichany execution, authority, capability, or system state can be
immediately stopped, revoked, or invalidated.
A system must be able to interrupt, terminate, or withdraw
execution instantly and effectively.
If execution cannot be stopped, it cannot be considered controlled.
A. Module Abstract
The Kill / Revoke Module establishes the conditions requiredto ensure that systems retain ultimate control over execution.
The objective is to ensure that:
- any action can be stopped instantly
- permissions can be revoked immediately
- compromised states can be invalidated
- system control remains enforceable under all conditions
It defines the ability to stop what must not continue.
B. Module Purpose
The purpose of this module is to prevent uncontrolled continuationof execution.
Without kill and revoke capability:
- compromised systems continue operating
- malicious or incorrect actions persist
- control becomes delayed or ineffective
- system risk escalates
D.1 — Immediate Execution Termination
The system MUST allow:
- instant stopping of active processes
- interruption of ongoing actions
- prevention of continued execution
D.2 — Authority Revocation
The system MUST allow:
- removal of permissions
- invalidation of authority
- blocking of further actions by revoked entities
D.3 — Capability Withdrawal
The system MUST allow:
- disabling of skills or tools
- removal of execution capabilities
- blocking of compromised functions
D.4 — State Invalidation
The system MUST allow:
- marking system state as invalid
- isolating compromised components
- preventing continuation from invalid state
D.5 — Enforcement Priority
Kill and revoke operations MUST:
- override normal execution
- take precedence over ongoing processes
- execute without delay
E. Minimum Implementation Framework (MIF)
Step 1 — Define Kill TriggersCritical failure or unauthorized action triggers are defined.
Step 2 — Implement Immediate Stop Mechanism
Active processes can be halted immediately.
Step 3 — Enable Authority Revocation
Revoked entities cannot act further.
Step 4 — Enable Capability Withdrawal
Removed capabilities cannot execute.
Step 5 — Define State Invalidation
Invalid states cannot continue execution.
F. Validation Logic
A system is valid only if:
- execution can be stopped instantly
- permissions can be revoked immediately
- capabilities can be disabled
- invalid states are controlled
G. Prohibited Conditions
A system is non-compliant if:
- execution continues after stop request
- revoked authority remains active
- disabled capabilities still execute
- compromised state continues without control
- enforcement is delayed
H. Operational Output
A system implementing this module produces:
- immediate execution control
- enforceable authority revocation
- controlled capability lifecycle
- containment of compromised states
I. System Condition
- Valid — execution can be stopped at any time
- Invalid — any execution cannot be interrupted
J. Integration Logic
This module operates together with:
- INTEGROS® — integrity enforcement
- Delegation Chain Module — authority origin
- Skill Governance Module — capability control
- Runtime Authority Module — real-time permission
- CGRM — decision authority
- RTI — responsibility continuity
under failure.
K. Use Case 1 — Runaway AI Execution
ScenarioAn AI agent continues executing actions beyond intended scope.
Without Kill / Revoke
- system cannot stop execution
- actions continue uncontrolled
- risk escalates
- execution is immediately stopped
- permissions revoked
- system stabilized
The system prevents escalation and maintains control.
L. Use Case 2 — Compromised System Component
ScenarioA system component becomes compromised or behaves incorrectly.
Without Kill / Revoke
- compromised component continues operating
- system integrity degrades
- component is isolated
- capabilities disabled
- state invalidated
The system contains failure and prevents spread.
Canonical Closing Statement
A system is not defined by what it allows.It is defined by what it can stop.