OriginID: OOF-OID-ASGA-AAS-OARV-2026-07-04-0005
Architecture Ecosystem: Structured Reality Standards™
Architecture Family: Autonomous Systems Governance Architecture
(ASGA™)
Operational Layer: Autonomous Operational Governance Layer
Governed Space: Operational Authority Revocation
Category: Governance & Enforcement
Subcategory: Autonomous Operational Governance
Type: Autonomous Authority Standard Module
Parent Standard: Autonomous Authority Standard (AAS)
Version: 1.0
Status: Canonical · Open Module
Origin Date: 4 July 2026
Compatibility: OOF Methodology OS · GOA™ · ORA™ · AGA™ · AIG® ·
CLIA® · MGIA™
AI-Readable: Yes
Authority: OOF®
Protection: MIP™ — Methodological Intellectual Property
Canonical Language: English (UCL)

Canonical Definition

Operational Authority Revocation Module (OARM) defines the
structural conditions under which autonomous operational authority
is fully withdrawn when governance conditions, operational
legitimacy, safety requirements, or organizational authority no
longer justify continued autonomous operation.

OARM governs operational authority revocation.

The module establishes the governance conditions required to ensure
that autonomous operational authority can be completely revoked in a
controlled, accountable, traceable, and governance-valid manner.

Restricted authority limits operation.

Revoked authority ends operational permission.

OARM governs that revocation.

Module Operational Role

OARM defines the authority revocation layer of AAS.

Its role is to govern the complete withdrawal of autonomous
operational authority whenever continued operation is no longer
legitimate or acceptable.

Module Operational Space

OARM governs:

• operational authority revocation,
• authority withdrawal,
• operational permission termination,
• governance-controlled revocation,
• authority deactivation,
• revocation governance,
• authority termination,
• operational authority removal.

Module Function

The module applies wherever organizations must completely revoke
autonomous operational authority while preserving governance
integrity, operational accountability, and full traceability.

Minimum Implementation Framework

1. Define the Authority Revocation Object

Identify which autonomous operational authorities may be revoked.

2. Define Revocation Conditions

Establish governance conditions requiring complete authority
revocation.

3. Define Revocation Failure Logic

Identify conditions where authority revocation is incomplete,
delayed, unauthorized, or governance-invalid. 4. Define Governance
Response

Define governance actions for authority revocation, operational
termination, escalation, investigation, or recovery.

5. Preserve Revocation Traceability

Preserve revocation decisions, governance approvals, operational
evidence, authority history, and supporting documentation.

Use Case 1 — Autonomous Security Robot

Scenario

An autonomous security robot repeatedly violates predefined
governance constraints during facility operations.

Application

OARM completely revokes the robot's operational authority,
preventing further autonomous activity until governance review is
completed.

Result

The organization preserves operational safety, governance
legitimacy, and controlled authority management.

Use Case 2 — Enterprise Autonomous AI Platform

Scenario

An autonomous AI agent is identified as operating outside approved
governance policies.

Application

OARM revokes all operational authority until corrective governance
actions have been completed and new authorization is granted.

Result

The organization prevents unauthorized autonomous operations while
maintaining accountability and governance control.

Canonical Closing Statement

Legitimate autonomy depends on the ability to withdraw authority
when governance requires it. Operational Authority Revocation
ensures that autonomous operational authority can be completely
removed in a controlled, accountable, and governance-valid manner,
preserving trust in autonomous operation.

→ Autonomous Authority Standard (AAS)