Skill Transfer Integrity Module (STIM)

OOF™ Origin Open Foundation™

Independent Methodological Authority

OriginID: OOF-OID-MEM-STIM-2026-06-12-0003
Architecture Ecosystem: Structured Reality Standards™
Architecture Family: Memory Governance Intelligence Architecture (MGIA™)
Operational Layer: Skill Formation Governance Layer
Governed Space: Skill Transfer Integrity
Category: AI & Interpretation
Subcategory: Skill Transfer Governance
Type: Skill Formation Integrity Module
Parent Standard: Skill Formation Integrity Standard (SFIS)
Version: 1.0
Status: Canonical · Open Module
Origin Date: 12 June 2026
Compatibility: OOF Methodology OS · Skill Formation Integrity Standard (SFIS) · Skill Acquisition Integrity Module (SAIM)
· Skill Development Integrity Module (SDIM) · Memory Integrity Standard (MIS) · Human Cognition Integrity Standard (HCIS)
· INTEGROS® — Integrity Standard
AI-Readable: Yes
Authority: OOF
Protection: MIP — Methodological Intellectual Property
Canonical Language: English (UCL)


Minimum Implementation Framework

1. Define the Skill Transfer Object
The organization must define which capability-transfer environments require governance.
This may include:

  • apprenticeship systems
  • educational systems
  • AI training environments
  • Human-AI learning systems
  • organizational mentoring programs
  • robotics capability transfer
  • knowledge-sharing environments
  • collective intelligence systems

2. Define Skill Transfer Conditions
The system must define the conditions under which transfer remains valid.
This includes:

  • transfer requirements
  • reproducibility requirements
  • traceability requirements
  • accountability requirements
  • validation requirements
  • governance-valid transfer conditions

3. Define Transfer Degradation Detection Logic
The system must define how transfer failures are identified.
This may include:

  • competence loss
  • transfer distortion
  • capability degradation
  • contextual misunderstanding
  • transfer gaps
  • non-reproducible expertise

4. Define Operational Response or Governance Logic
The system must define governance logic for transfer-integrity failures.
Governance response may include:

  • transfer review
  • competency validation
  • governance intervention
  • escalation
  • retraining procedures
  • transfer correction
  • operational invalidation where required

5. Preserve Traceability & Restrict Invalid Conditions
The system must preserve reconstructable traceability of:

  • transfer activities
  • training events
  • validation reviews
  • governance actions
  • intervention procedures
  • resulting capability states

A skill-formation environment must not remain transfer-valid
if materially significant skills cannot be reproduced, validated, reviewed, or governed after transfer.