CRDM — Core Resource Demand Module

Architecture: RSGA™ — Resource Sustainability Governance Architecture

Parent Standard: Resource Demand Governance Standard (RDGS)

Category: Governance & Enforcement

Subcategory: Resource Governance

Type: Core Module

Governed Space: Core Resource Demand Governance

Module ID: RSGA-RDGS-CRDM-01

Origin ID: OOF-RSGA-RDGS-CRDM

Version: 1.0

Status: Draft Module

Effective Date: 5 October 2026

Compatibility: Methodology OS — Modular Compatibility

GIE-Compatible: Yes

AI-Readable: Yes

Authority: OOF® — OriginOpen® Foundation

Protection: Protected Methodological Work

Canonical Language: English

1. Canonical Definition

CRDM — Core Resource Demand Module governs how a candidate Resource requirement is identified, bounded, attributed to a Demand Source, associated with the relevant Resource, quantified in an appropriate native measurement, evidenced, qualified, and converted into a governed Core Resource Demand State before more detailed functional, peak, concurrency, and consolidation governance occurs.

CRDM establishes the foundational Demand object within RDGS.

Resource Requirement Signal ≠ Governed Resource Demand.

2. Operational Role

CRDM is the first Core Module of RDGS.

It receives Resource-related requirement signals from operational systems, participants, infrastructure, processes, plans, measurements, or other relevant sources and determines whether those signals can be represented as a governed Resource Demand object.

Its role is to establish:

what Resource is being demanded; what entity, system, process, or function generates the Demand; what Demand boundary applies; what quantity, capacity, rate, or other Resource requirement is represented; which native measurement applies; which evidence supports the Demand; which uncertainty remains; and whether the Demand is sufficiently established to proceed through RDGS.

3. Core Question

What Resource requirement actually exists, what is its governed boundary, who or what generates it, how much Resource is required, and what evidence supports that requirement?

4. Position in RDGS Module Flow

CRDM — Core Resource Demand Module → FDIM — Functional Demand Identification Module → PKDM — Peak Demand Module → CPDM — Concurrent & Parallel Demand Module → DCMM — Demand Consolidation & Management Module

CRDM establishes the Core Demand object upon which the remaining RDGS modules operate.

5. Governed Space

CRDM governs:

Core Resource Demand Governance

This space concerns the transformation of Resource requirement signals into sufficiently identified, bounded, measured, evidenced, and governable Resource Demand objects.

6. Governed Object

The primary Governed Object is:

A Candidate Resource Demand and its resulting Core Resource Demand State.

The Demand may concern:

Resource quantity; Resource capacity; Resource flow; Resource throughput; Resource rate; Resource availability requirement; Resource performance requirement; other Resource-specific requirement.

7. Scope

CRDM applies whenever a Resource requirement must be established before downstream Resource Demand Governance can occur.

Its Scope includes:

Demand signal identification; Demand Source identification; Resource identification; Demand object formation; Demand boundary definition; Demand quantity; Demand capacity; Demand rate; native measurement; measurement basis; Demand evidence; Demand provenance; Demand uncertainty; Demand conflict; Demand duplication screening; Demand sufficiency; Demand state formation; Demand change; Demand reassessment; Demand versioning.

CRDM does not independently govern:

detailed functional Demand decomposition; Peak Demand determination; Demand concurrency and parallelism; final Demand consolidation; Resource Dependency; Criticality; Access authorization; Priority; Allocation; Consumption; Scarcity; Resilience; Sustainability.

8. Entry Condition

CRDM may receive a candidate Resource requirement from:

Operational measurement

Participant request

System request

Technical specification

Infrastructure requirement

Workload signal

Production requirement

Process requirement

Historical Resource record

Operational plan

Prediction output

Simulation output

Derived technical requirement

Other sufficiently identifiable Demand signal

The existence of an input does not establish governed Demand.

9. Demand Signal

A Demand Signal is any observation, request, measurement, record, calculation, or system state indicating that Resource may be required.

A Demand Signal is an input to governance.

It is not automatically the governed Demand.

Demand Signal ≠ Resource Demand.

10. Signal Classification

CRDM should identify the nature of the incoming Demand Signal.

Possible classifications include:

Observed

Measured

Requested

Declared

Derived

Estimated

Planned

Predicted

Simulated

Assumed

11. Signal Provenance

The origin of the Demand Signal should remain traceable.

Where relevant, provenance includes:

Source system

Participant

Sensor

Technical model

Operational process

Prediction methodology

Simulation

Planning process

Timestamp

Version:

12. Demand Source

Every Core Resource Demand should identify the Demand Source.

The Demand Source is the entity, system, process, function, infrastructure, or other operational object from which the Resource requirement originates.

13. Demand Source Identity

Demand Source identity should be sufficiently precise to distinguish one Resource requirement from another.

Generic labels should not replace identifiable Demand Sources where the distinction materially affects governance.

14. Demand Source vs Resource Source

The Demand Source and Resource Source are different concepts.

Demand Source ≠ Resource Source.

Demand Source identifies where the requirement originates.

Resource Source identifies where Resource supply originates.

15. Demand Source vs Resource Origin

The origin of Resource does not identify the origin of Demand.

Demand Origin ≠ Resource Origin.

16. Participant Demand

A human, organization, institution, system, or other participant may generate a Resource request or requirement.

CRDM governs the Resource Demand object, not the participant's general identity governance.

17. System Demand

An operational system may generate Resource Demand automatically.

Examples include:

Compute system

Cooling system

Manufacturing line

Water treatment system

Electrical infrastructure

Network infrastructure

18. Process Demand

A process may create a Resource requirement independently of the overall system's maximum Resource capability.

The relevant process should remain identifiable.

19. Infrastructure Demand

Infrastructure may require Resource capacity for:

operation; standby; maintenance; recovery; supporting services.

These requirements may need separate Demand objects.

20. Resource Identification

Every Demand object must identify the Resource being demanded.

CRDM should consume the governed Resource identity established through RCHS where available.

21. Resource Identity Integrity

A Demand for one Resource must not be silently represented as Demand for another Resource merely because both support the same function.

22. Cross-Resource Requirement

A single operation may generate several distinct Resource Demand objects.

Example:

AI workload → Compute Demand → Electricity Demand → Cooling Demand → Water Demand → Network Demand

Each Resource remains independently governed.

23. Resource Bundle Boundary

Several Resources may be operationally required together.

Their relationship may be represented.

Their physical identity must not be collapsed.

Joint Requirement ≠ Resource Equivalence.

24. Candidate Demand Object

A Candidate Demand Object is formed when:

Demand Source + Resource + Requirement Signal

are sufficiently identifiable to begin Demand governance.

25. Demand Object Identity

Every material Demand object should have a stable identifier where system complexity requires traceability.

26. Demand Object Persistence

A Demand object may persist through multiple measurements, revisions, and operating states.

Identity persistence does not imply that its Demand quantity remains unchanged.

27. Demand Boundary

The Demand Boundary defines which Resource requirement belongs to the Demand object.

It should identify:

included requirement; excluded requirement; Demand Source; Resource; relevant operating boundary.

28. Boundary Integrity

Demand boundaries must follow operational Resource reality rather than organizational convenience.

29. Organizational Boundary

A department, company, facility, or administrative unit may provide a useful Demand boundary.

It should not override the actual Resource-dependent system boundary where those differ.

30. Functional Boundary

Where a Resource requirement belongs to a particular operational function, the Demand boundary should preserve that relationship.

FDIM performs deeper functional governance downstream.

31. Physical Boundary

A physical system boundary may determine which Resource requirements belong to the Demand object.

32. Infrastructure Boundary

Infrastructure may define a Demand boundary where Resource consumption or capacity requirement can be materially isolated.

33. Temporal Boundary

A Demand object may apply only during a defined interval.

CRDM should preserve the temporal boundary where known.

Detailed Demand temporal structures may be refined downstream.

34. Spatial Boundary

A Demand object may apply to a specific:

facility; site; network node; region; system location.

35. Boundary Overlap

Two Candidate Demand objects may overlap.

CRDM should detect potential overlap before treating them as independent Demand.

36. Boundary Duplication

Where two Demand records represent the same underlying Resource requirement, they should not automatically become two additive Demand objects.

37. Demand Duplication Risk

Duplication may arise through:

multiple reporting systems; organizational records; participant requests; technical monitoring; planning systems; replicated databases.

38. Duplicate Demand Screening

CRDM should compare:

Resource ID

Demand Source

Demand boundary

time

location

underlying requirement

before establishing independent Demand objects.

39. Independent Demand

Two Resource requirements may be treated as independent only where their underlying operational requirements are sufficiently distinct.

40. Demand Quantity

Demand Quantity represents the amount of Resource required within the defined Demand boundary.

41. Demand Capacity

Some Resource requirements are capacity requirements rather than accumulated quantity.

Examples:

MW

GPU capacity

storage capacity

network bandwidth

42. Demand Rate

Flow-based Resources may require a rate.

Examples:

m³/hour

litres/second

MW

GB/s

tonnes/hour

43. Quantity vs Capacity

A total Resource quantity and required Resource capacity must remain distinguishable.

44. Quantity vs Rate

Required Quantity ≠ Required Rate.

A system may have sufficient Resource quantity while lacking the necessary rate of delivery.

45. Capacity vs Consumption

Required capacity is not the same as Resource consumed.

Demand Capacity ≠ Resource Consumption.

46. Native Measurement

CRDM should preserve Resource Demand in a Resource-native or technically appropriate measurement wherever possible.

47. Native Measurement Examples

Examples include:

m³

m³/day

MW

MWh

tonnes

kg/hour

GPU-hours

accelerator-equivalent units

GB

GB/s

48. Measurement Definition

Every Demand measurement should preserve what the value actually represents.

A number without measurement semantics may be insufficient for governance.

49. Measurement Basis

The measurement basis may include:

direct measurement; technical derivation; operational calculation; declared requirement; historical inference; Prediction; Simulation; assumption.

50. Measurement Period

Where Resource Demand is measured across time, the measurement period should remain explicit.

51. Measurement Granularity

Granularity should reflect the Resource requirement.

Annual Demand may be insufficient where hourly peaks matter.

Millisecond measurements may be unnecessary where Demand changes slowly.

52. Measurement Sufficiency

CRDM requires sufficient relevant measurement detail, not maximum possible measurement detail.

53. Unit Integrity

Demand values expressed in different units must not be combined without valid conversion.

54. Conversion Traceability

Where unit conversion occurs, the conversion basis should remain traceable.

55. Physical Measurement Preservation

Native physical Resource measurements should be preserved before normalization or derived comparison.

Native Resource Demand ≠ Normalized Resource Significance.

56. Requested Quantity

A requested quantity may initiate Demand governance.

It does not establish validated Demand.

Requested Quantity ≠ Governed Demand Quantity.

57. Declared Quantity

A participant or system may declare a Resource requirement.

Declared Quantity ≠ Validated Demand Quantity.

58. Installed Consumption Capability

Installed infrastructure may establish the maximum Resource capacity the system could consume.

It does not establish actual Demand.

Installed Consumption Capability ≠ Resource Demand.

59. Maximum Theoretical Requirement

Maximum theoretical Resource use may define an upper technical boundary.

It must not automatically become governed Demand.

60. Historical Consumption

Historical Consumption may provide Demand evidence.

It is not Demand itself.

Historical Consumption ≠ Current Resource Demand.

61. Current Consumption

Current Consumption may provide evidence about Resource requirement.

A system may consume above or below actual Demand.

Current Consumption ≠ Resource Demand by definition.

62. Low Consumption Under Constraint

Resource shortage may suppress Consumption.

Therefore:

Low Consumption ≠ Low Demand.

63. Excess Consumption

A system may consume more Resource than required because of inefficiency, waste, configuration, or operational behaviour.

Therefore:

High Consumption ≠ High Demand by definition.

64. Demand Derivation

Where Demand is derived rather than directly measured, the derivation method must remain explicit.

65. Derivation Inputs

Derived Demand may use:

workload; production volume; technical Resource coefficient; system configuration; operational requirement; process model.

66. Derivation Integrity

A derived Demand value is only as reliable as the assumptions, inputs, and mechanism used to derive it.

67. Estimated Demand

Where direct measurement is unavailable, CRDM may represent estimated Demand.

The estimation status must remain visible.

68. Demand Range

Where exact Demand cannot be justified, CRDM may establish a range.

Example:

Required Capacity: 80–95 MW

may be more governable than unsupported:

Required Capacity: 88.4 MW

69. False Precision

CRDM should reject unjustified precision.

Numerical Precision ≠ Evidentiary Precision.

70. Minimum Demand

Where supported, CRDM may establish the minimum Resource requirement necessary for the relevant Demand object.

This does not determine Criticality.

71. Maximum Demand Boundary

CRDM may establish an upper Demand boundary where evidence supports it.

Maximum Demand does not automatically equal expected or current Demand.

72. Demand Evidence

Every material Core Resource Demand should have an identifiable evidence basis.

73. Direct Evidence

Direct evidence may include:

meter readings; system telemetry; Resource measurements; operational measurements; verified technical state.

74. Technical Evidence

Technical evidence may include:

equipment specifications; system requirements;

process specifications; capacity requirements; engineering documentation.

75. Operational Evidence

Operational evidence may include:

workload records; production schedules; process activity; system operating states; Resource-dependent operational outputs.

76. Historical Evidence

Historical evidence may support Demand determination where the historical operating conditions remain relevant.

77. Planning Evidence

Operational plans may support future Demand.

Planning evidence must remain distinguishable from current operational evidence.

78. Prediction Evidence

Predicted Demand may be used where future Resource requirements matter.

PGA™ governs the Prediction methodology.

CRDM preserves its Prediction status.

79. Simulation Evidence

Simulation may produce Resource Demand under hypothetical conditions.

SIMULOS® governs Simulation.

CRDM preserves its simulated status.

80. Assumption

An assumption may temporarily support a Demand object where evidence is incomplete.

The assumption must remain explicit.

Assumption ≠ Evidence.

81. Evidence Hierarchy Boundary

CRDM does not impose one universal evidence hierarchy across all Resource types.

Evidence quality depends upon the governed Resource and Demand context.

82. Evidence Relevance

Evidence should support the actual Resource requirement being governed.

Evidence of installed capability may not prove operational Demand.

83. Evidence Time

Demand evidence should preserve the time at which it represented the relevant Resource requirement.

84. Evidence Freshness

Demand evidence may become stale after operational change.

85. Evidence Validity

Evidence validity should reflect:

Demand volatility; system change; Resource function; measurement basis; governance consequence.

86. Evidence Provenance

At minimum, provenance should preserve where relevant:

Evidence source

Demand Source

Resource

Measurement or derivation method

Time

Version:

87. Evidence Conflict

Two credible evidence sources may support different Demand values.

The conflict should remain visible.

88. Demand Conflict State

A Demand should enter a Conflicted state where incompatible evidence cannot yet be legitimately resolved.

89. Conflict Resolution Logic

Canonical logic:

**Demand Evidence A

Demand Evidence B → Resource Identity Check → Demand Source Check → Boundary Check → Measurement Basis Check → Time Check → Unit Check → Evidence Relevance Check → Resolution or Preserved Conflict**

90. Demand Uncertainty

Demand uncertainty may arise from:

measurement limitations; variable operation; incomplete evidence; unknown conditions; future state; conflicting evidence; derivation assumptions.

91. Quantitative Uncertainty

Demand quantity may be represented as:

exact value where justified; range; minimum; maximum; distribution where appropriate; unknown.

92. Structural Uncertainty

Uncertainty may concern whether the Demand boundary itself is correct.

93. Source Uncertainty

The system generating Demand may be partially unresolved.

94. Resource Uncertainty

The Resource being demanded may be ambiguously identified.

Where Resource identity is unresolved, CRDM should not silently proceed as though it were certain.

95. Measurement Uncertainty

Measurement uncertainty should remain attached to the Demand value where material.

96. Uncertainty Propagation

Uncertain Demand must remain uncertain downstream until resolved or legitimately bounded.

97. Demand Sufficiency

CRDM determines whether the Core Resource Demand object is sufficiently established for further RDGS governance.

98. Sufficient Core Demand

A Core Resource Demand may be considered sufficiently established where:

Resource is identified; Demand Source is identified; Demand boundary is sufficiently defined; quantity/capacity/rate is represented appropriately; measurement basis is known; material evidence exists; material uncertainty is represented.

99. Conditional Core Demand

A Demand may proceed conditionally where limitations remain explicit and downstream governance can legitimately preserve them.

100. Partially Established Demand

A Demand may be partially established where some required components are known while others remain unresolved.

101. Evidence-Limited Demand

A Demand is Evidence-Limited where Resource requirement cannot be established with sufficient confidence because material evidence is missing or inadequate.

102. Conflicted Demand

A Demand is Conflicted where credible evidence supports incompatible Demand states.

103. Demand Unknown

Demand is Unknown where the Resource requirement cannot currently be established.

104. Demand Unresolved

Demand is Unresolved where a governance determination cannot yet be completed.

105. Core Demand Decision States

At minimum, CRDM should support:

Core Demand Established

Conditionally Established

Partially Established

Demand Evidence-Limited

Demand Conflicted

Demand Unknown

Demand Unresolved

106. Core Resource Demand Profile

The principal CRDM output is the:

Core Resource Demand Profile

It provides the foundational Demand object for subsequent RDGS modules.

107. Minimum Profile Fields

A minimum Core Resource Demand Profile should support:

Demand ID

Resource ID

Demand Source ID

Demand Source Type

Demand Boundary

Demand Quantity / Capacity

Demand Rate where relevant

Native Measurement

Measurement Basis

Relevant Time Reference

Relevant Location Reference

Evidence Basis

Evidence Time

Uncertainty

Demand State

Sufficiency State

Version:

108. Demand Identity Persistence

A revised Demand value should not automatically create a new Demand identity where the underlying Demand object remains the same.

109. Demand Versioning

Material Demand changes should create a new governed version.

110. Version Record

A Demand version record should preserve where relevant:

Previous value

New value

Changed boundary

Changed Resource

Changed Demand Source

Changed measurement basis

Reason for change

Evidence

Effective time

111. Demand Creation

A new Demand object may be created where a materially distinct Resource requirement emerges.

112. Demand Activation

A previously conditional or standby Demand may become active.

CRDM records the change in Core Demand State.

Detailed functional and temporal interpretation continues downstream.

113. Demand Suspension

A Demand may temporarily cease to apply while retaining identity.

114. Demand Termination

A Demand object may terminate where the underlying Resource requirement no longer exists.

115. Demand Reopening

A terminated or inactive Demand may reappear.

CRDM should determine whether it represents:

the same Demand object reactivated

or:

a new Demand object.

116. Material Change

Material changes may include:

Resource change; Demand Source change; boundary change; quantity change; capacity change; rate change; measurement basis change; evidence change; operational state change.

117. Reassessment Trigger

CRDM reassessment should occur following material:

new measurement; new operational evidence; Demand Source change; Resource change; system reconfiguration; boundary change; evidence expiry; evidence conflict; Demand activation; Demand suspension; Demand termination.

118. Reassessment Logic

Canonical logic:

Existing Core Resource Demand Profile → New Evidence / Material Change → Demand Impact Test → Demand Retained or Revised → Version Update → Downstream RDGS Reassessment

119. Demand vs Functional Demand

CRDM establishes the Core Demand object.

FDIM determines the detailed relationship between Demand and the Resource-dependent function.

Core Demand Identification ≠ Full Functional Demand Governance.

120. Demand vs Peak Demand

CRDM may preserve observed or stated Demand values.

PKDM determines Peak Demand structures.

Core Demand Quantity ≠ Peak Demand Determination.

121. Demand vs Concurrent Demand

CRDM identifies individual Demand objects.

CPDM determines whether multiple Demand objects apply simultaneously or in parallel.

Individual Demand ≠ Concurrent Demand Structure.

122. Demand vs Consolidated Demand

CRDM does not establish the final consolidated Demand state across multiple Demand objects.

DCMM owns Demand consolidation and management.

123. Demand vs Resource Availability

CRDM establishes Resource requirement independently of whether sufficient Resource capacity exists.

Demand ≠ Availability.

RACS retains Resource Availability & Capacity Governance.

124. Demand vs Resource Dependency

CRDM establishes what Resource is required.

RDCS determines how strongly the governed system depends upon that Resource.

125. Demand vs Criticality

CRDM does not determine the consequence of failing to satisfy Demand.

Demand Quantity ≠ Criticality.

126. Demand vs Access

Demand does not establish permission to access Resource.

Demand ≠ Access Authorization.

127. Demand vs Priority

A larger Demand does not automatically deserve greater Priority.

Demand Magnitude ≠ Resource Priority.

128. Demand vs Allocation

CRDM does not allocate Resource.

Governed Demand ≠ Allocated Resource.

129. Demand vs Consumption

CRDM determines Resource requirement.

RCUS governs actual Resource Consumption & Utilization.

130. Demand vs Scarcity

Demand may later contribute to Scarcity governance.

CRDM does not establish Scarcity State.

131. Demand vs Sustainability

A valid Resource Demand may still be unsustainable.

CRDM does not determine long-term Resource Sustainability.

132. Demand vs Value

A Resource Demand may support high or low Value.

Value does not redefine the amount of Resource actually required.

VEGA™ retains relevant Value Governance.

133. Demand vs Willingness to Pay

A participant's willingness to pay does not establish the underlying Resource requirement.

134. Demand vs Authority

The ability to submit or declare a Demand does not create Resource authority.

Demand Declaration Capability ≠ Resource Authority.

135. Resource Availability Context

CRDM may receive RACS Resource Availability & Capacity information as context.

It must not alter the Demand object merely to fit available capacity.

136. Demand-Capacity Independence

If:

Demand = 100

and:

Available Capacity = 60

CRDM should preserve Demand at 100 where evidence supports it.

The 40-unit difference becomes a downstream governance issue.

137. Suppressed Demand

Where Consumption is constrained by limited Resource Availability, actual Resource requirement may exceed observed Consumption.

CRDM should support recognition of suppressed Demand where evidence supports it.

138. Latent Demand

A Resource requirement may exist without being expressed as active Consumption or a formal request.

Latent Demand should only be represented where sufficient evidence supports the underlying requirement.

139. Demand Inflation

Requests or declared Demand may exceed the actual Resource requirement.

CRDM should not automatically inherit inflated claims.

140. Demand Understatement

Declared Demand may also understate actual Resource requirements.

Governance should follow evidence rather than the preferred numerical outcome.

141. Demand Integrity Principle

The Demand boundary and quantity must follow the governed Resource requirement, not the preferred allocation outcome.

142. Evidence Independence Principle

Evidence should establish Demand.

Demand should not determine which evidence is accepted merely because a particular value is desired.

143. Demand Reality Principle

Resource Demand is a governed representation of Resource requirement, not a negotiation position.

144. Minimum Implementation Framework

A minimum operational CRDM implementation should contain eight governed layers.

Layer 1 — Demand Signal

Receive:

Requirement signal Request

Measurement System state Operational evidence

Layer 2 — Demand Identity

Establish:

Demand ID Resource ID Demand Source

Layer 3 — Demand Boundary

Define:

Included requirement Excluded requirement Relevant system/process boundary

Layer 4 — Measurement

Determine:

Quantity Capacity Rate where relevant Native measurement Measurement basis

Layer 5 — Evidence

Preserve:

Evidence source Evidence time Provenance Validity

Layer 6 — Integrity Checks

Assess:

Duplication Boundary overlap Unit integrity Measurement relevance Evidence conflict

Layer 7 — Uncertainty & Sufficiency

Determine:

Uncertainty Demand State Sufficiency State

Layer 8 — Governed Output

Produce:

Core Resource Demand Profile Version Known limitations

Reassessment triggers FDIM handoff state

Minimum machine-readable logic:

Demand Signal → Resource → Demand Source → Demand Boundary → Quantity / Capacity / Rate → Native Measurement → Evidence[] → Integrity Checks[] → Uncertainty[] → Demand State → Sufficiency → Core Resource Demand Profile

145. Minimum Decision States

At minimum:

Core Demand Established

Conditionally Established

Partially Established

Demand Evidence-Limited

Demand Conflicted

Demand Unknown

Demand Unresolved

146. Minimum Evidence Path

Where Core Resource Demand cannot be sufficiently established:

Demand Unresolved → Material Evidence Gap → Minimum Evidence Requirement → Evidence Acquisition → Demand Reassessment → Updated Core Resource Demand Profile

The objective is sufficient evidence of Resource requirement, not unlimited data collection.

147. Minimum Reassessment Framework

At minimum:

Current Core Resource Demand Profile → New Evidence / Material Change → Demand Impact Test → State Retained or Revised → Profile Version Update → Downstream RDGS Reassessment

148. Governance Requirements

A conforming CRDM implementation must:

1. identify the Demand Signal; 2. preserve Signal provenance; 3. identify the Resource; 4. identify the Demand Source; 5. establish Demand identity; 6. establish Demand boundary; 7. distinguish Demand Source from Resource Source; 8. preserve cross-Resource distinctions; 9. determine Demand quantity, capacity, or rate as appropriate; 10. preserve native measurement; 11. preserve measurement basis; 12. preserve measurement period where relevant; 13. distinguish request from governed Demand; 14. distinguish installed capability from Demand; 15. distinguish Consumption from Demand; 16. support derived and estimated Demand; 17. support governed Demand ranges; 18. prevent false precision; 19. preserve evidence provenance; 20. preserve evidence freshness; 21. detect material evidence conflict; 22. detect potential Demand duplication; 23. preserve material uncertainty; 24. determine Demand sufficiency; 25. support conditional progression; 26. support Demand state change; 27. support reassessment; 28. support versioning; 29. produce a Core Resource Demand Profile; 30. preserve unresolved limitations downstream.

149. Governance Logic

Canonical CRDM logic:

Resource Requirement Signal → Signal Classification → Demand Source Identification → Resource Identification → Candidate Demand Object → Demand Boundary → Quantity / Capacity / Rate → Native Measurement → Measurement Basis → Evidence → Duplication Check → Conflict Check → Uncertainty → Sufficiency Determination → Core Resource Demand State → Core Resource Demand Profile

Where evidence is insufficient:

Candidate Demand → Evidence Gap → Minimum Evidence Requirement → Evidence Acquisition → Reassessment

Where Demand changes:

Existing Core Demand → Material Change → Demand Impact Test → Revised Demand → Version Update → Downstream Reassessment

150. Governance Outputs

CRDM may produce:

Core Resource Demand Profile

Demand ID

Demand Source State

Resource Requirement State

Demand Boundary

Demand Quantity

Demand Capacity

Demand Rate

Native Measurement State

Measurement Basis

Demand Evidence State

Demand Provenance State

Demand Duplication State

Demand Conflict State

Demand Uncertainty State

Demand Sufficiency State

Demand Version

Reassessment Trigger

FDIM Handoff State

151. Downstream Release Condition

CRDM output may proceed into FDIM where the Core Resource Demand is sufficiently established for functional Demand governance or where remaining limitations can legitimately remain explicit.

Progression does not erase Demand uncertainty.

152. Failure Conditions

CRDM should not be considered sufficiently completed where:

a request is automatically treated as Demand; a Demand Source is materially unidentified; the Resource is materially unidentified; Demand boundary is materially undefined; duplicate Demand is counted independently; installed capability is treated automatically as Demand; historical Consumption is treated automatically as current Demand; current Consumption is treated automatically as Demand; low Consumption under Resource constraint is interpreted automatically as low Demand; declared quantity is treated as validated quantity without evidence; units are ambiguous; quantity and rate are confused; measurement basis is unknown; derived Demand hides its derivation; assumed Demand is represented as evidenced Demand; false precision is introduced; material evidence conflict is suppressed; material uncertainty is hidden; stale evidence is treated as current; Demand is changed merely to match Resource Availability; Demand is confused with Priority or Allocation.

153. Use Case 1 — AI Compute Resource Demand

An AI system has infrastructure capable of using:

10,000 accelerator-equivalent units.

A workload scheduler requests:

9,000 units.

Historical operation shows:

6,800–8,200 units.

Current workload telemetry and technical requirements establish:

7,600–8,000 accelerator-equivalent units

as the supported Core Resource Demand range under the current operating state.

CRDM distinguishes:

10,000 installed capability

from:

9,000 requested capacity

from:

historical Resource Consumption

from:

the currently evidenced Resource requirement.

It creates the Core Resource Demand Profile with the evidence basis and remaining uncertainty.

FDIM subsequently determines the detailed functional structure of that Demand.

Installed compute capability does not define actual compute Demand.

154. Use Case 2 — Industrial Water Resource Demand

An industrial facility is permitted and technically capable of receiving:

50,000 m³/day.

Its internal planning system requests:

45,000 m³/day.

Historical Consumption averaged:

38,000 m³/day.

Current production requirements and process measurements establish:

34,000–37,000 m³/day

as the evidenced Core Resource Demand under the current operating state.

CRDM does not treat:

permitted intake capacity, requested capacity, or historical Consumption

as automatically equivalent to Demand.

It establishes the Resource requirement from the governed evidence.

The amount a facility can receive, asks to receive, or previously consumed is not automatically the amount it currently requires.

155. Critical Distinctions

Demand Signal ≠ Resource Demand

Demand Source ≠ Resource Source

Demand Origin ≠ Resource Origin

Joint Requirement ≠ Resource Equivalence

Required Quantity ≠ Required Rate

Demand Capacity ≠ Resource Consumption

Native Resource Demand ≠ Normalized Resource Significance

Requested Quantity ≠ Governed Demand Quantity

Declared Quantity ≠ Validated Demand Quantity

Installed Consumption Capability ≠ Resource Demand

Historical Consumption ≠ Current Resource Demand

Current Consumption ≠ Resource Demand by definition

Low Consumption ≠ Low Demand

High Consumption ≠ High Demand by definition

Numerical Precision ≠ Evidentiary Precision

Assumption ≠ Evidence

Core Demand Identification ≠ Full Functional Demand Governance

Core Demand Quantity ≠ Peak Demand Determination

Individual Demand ≠ Concurrent Demand Structure

Demand ≠ Availability

Demand Quantity ≠ Criticality

Demand ≠ Access Authorization

Demand Magnitude ≠ Resource Priority

Governed Demand ≠ Allocated Resource

Demand Declaration Capability ≠ Resource Authority

156. Cross-Architecture Boundary

CRDM governs foundational Resource Demand formation within RDGS.

It may consume inputs from:

RCHS for Resource identity and characterization; RACS for Resource Availability & Capacity context; PGA™ for predicted Demand; SIMULOS® for simulated Demand; ORA™ for operational evidence; VEGA™ for relevant efficiency and Resource-use information; specialized Resource systems for technical Resource requirements.

It does not absorb their governed mechanisms.

157. Cross-Architecture Mechanism Principle

An operational mechanism may produce inputs for multiple governance architectures, but it belongs only to the architecture whose governed domain includes that mechanism itself. Other architectures govern only its domain- specific relevance or consequences.

A workload scheduler may produce compute requirements.

A production system may produce material requirements.

A building-management system may produce cooling or electricity requirements.

A hydrological model may produce water-demand estimates.

CRDM consumes those outputs to form governed Resource Demand.

It does not absorb the mechanisms that produced them.

158. Canonical Boundary

CRDM governs the foundational transformation of a Resource requirement signal into an identified, bounded, measured, evidenced, uncertainty-aware, and sufficiently governable Core Resource Demand object.

It does not determine detailed Functional Demand, Peak Demand, Demand concurrency, final Demand consolidation, Resource Dependency, Criticality, Access, Priority, Allocation, Consumption, Scarcity, Resilience, or Sustainability.

Its principal governed output is the Core Resource Demand Profile used by the remaining RDGS Core Modules.

159. Canonical Closing Statement

A Resource requirement does not become governed Demand merely because it appears in a request, a technical specification, a consumption record, or a system configuration.

CRDM establishes the Demand object itself — what Resource is required, who or what requires it, how much is required, where its boundary lies, and what evidence supports that requirement — before Resource Demand is allowed to proceed deeper into governance.

←