RAIM — Relationship Accountability Integrity Module
OriginID: OOF-OID-AGA-RAIM-2026-06-14-0005
Architecture Ecosystem: Structured Reality Standards™
Architecture Family: Accountability Governance Architecture (AGA™)
Operational Layer: Relationship Governance Layer
Category: Governance & Enforcement
Subcategory: Accountability Governance Architecture
Type: Relationship Accountability Standard Module
Parent Standard: Relationship Accountability Standard (RAS)
Version: 1.0
Status: Canonical · Open Module
Origin Date: 14 June 2026
Compatibility: Accountability Governance Architecture (AGA™) ·
Relationship Accountability Standard (RAS) ·
Accountability Governance Standard (AGS-A) · Accountability Chain
Standard (ACS-C) · Evidence Accountability
Standard (EAS)
AI-Readable: Yes
Authority: OOF
Protection: MIP — Methodological Intellectual Property
Canonical Language: English (UCL)
Canonical Definition
Relationship Accountability Integrity Module (RAIM) defines thestructural conditions under which relationships remain attributable,
accountable, evidence-supported, governable, and operationally valid
throughout their lifecycle.
RAIM governs relationship accountability.
The module establishes the conditions required to determine who
created, maintained, modified, governed, supervised, benefited from,
or remained accountable for a relationship throughout
its operational existence.
Module Operational Space
RAIM governs:- relationship accountability
- relationship ownership
- relationship governance accountability
- relationship supervision accountability
- relationship consequence attribution
- accountability traceability
- accountability preservation
The module applies wherever governance must determine accountability
connected to relationships.
Module Function
The module ensures that governance can determine:- who established the relationship
- who approved the relationship
- who maintained the relationship
- who supervised the relationship
- who benefited from the relationship
- who remained accountable for the relationship
- who remains accountable for consequences arising from the relationship
Its function is to prevent accountability gaps at the
relationship layer.
Minimum Implementation Framework
1. Define the Relationship Accountability ScopeDetermine which relationships require accountability analysis.
Examples:
- employment relationships
- contractor relationships
- subcontractor relationships
- supplier relationships
- Human-AI relationships
- multi-agent relationships
2. Identify Relationship Governance Actors
Identify actors responsible for creating, maintaining, governing,
supervising, or approving the relationship.
Examples:
- employers
- managers
- contractors
- organizational leaders
- AI system owners
- governance authorities
3. Map Relationship Accountability
Determine how accountability is distributed across the
relationship structure.
Governance must identify:
- primary accountability
- shared accountability
- delegated accountability
- retained accountability
- unresolved accountability
4. Validate Accountability Integrity
Determine whether accountability remains identifiable
and operationally valid.
Governance must identify:
- accountability gaps
- accountability fragmentation
- hidden accountability
- disputed accountability
- abandoned accountability
5. Preserve Accountability Traceability
Maintain sufficient evidence to reconstruct accountability
throughout the relationship lifecycle.
Use Case 1 — Agency Employment Structure
ScenarioA worker is formally employed by an agency but performs work under
the operational direction of another company.
Application
RAIM determines who remains accountable for maintaining and
governing the relationship structure.
Result
Governance gains visibility into accountability beyond
formal contractual arrangements.
Use Case 2 — Orchestrated Agent Environment
ScenarioMultiple AI agents operate through a centralized orchestration layer
under organizational supervision.
Application
RAIM determines accountability for creating, governing, and
maintaining operational relationships between participating systems.
Result
Governance gains visibility into accountability across
the relationship structure.
Canonical Closing Statement
Relationship Accountability Integrity Module (RAIM) defines thestructural conditions under which relationships remain attributable,
accountable, evidence-supported, governable, and operationally valid
throughout their lifecycle.
A relationship may create authority, responsibility, control, and
consequence. Governance therefore requires accountability not only
for actions, but also for the relationships that make those
actions possible.