Consequence Attribution Module (CAAM)
OriginID: OOF-OID-OBID-RIS-CAAM-2026-07-12-0005
Architecture Ecosystem: Structured Reality Standards™
Architecture Family: OBIDENITY® — Origin-Bound Identity
Governance Architecture
Operational Layer: Identity Governance Layer
Governed Space: Consequence Attribution
Category: Governance & Enforcement
Subcategory: Identity Governance
Type: Responsibility Integrity Standard Module
Parent Standard: Responsibility Integrity Standard (RIS)
Version: 1.0
Status: Canonical · Open Module
Origin Date: 12 July 2026
Compatibility: OOF Methodology OS · GOA™ · ORA™ · AGA™ · AIG® · CLIA®
· MGIA™ · ASGA™
AI-Readable: Yes
Authority: OOF®
Protection: MIP™ — Methodological Intellectual Property
Canonical Language: English (UCL)
Canonical Definition
Consequence Attribution Module (CAAM) defines the structuralconditions under which the consequences of actions performed on behalf
of a governed identity remain attributable, verifiable,
evidence-supported, and continuously governable throughout the
complete identity lifecycle.
CAAM governs consequence attribution.
The module establishes the governance conditions required to ensure
that every governance outcome can be attributed to the legitimate
participant responsible for the corresponding action or decision.
Actions create consequences.
Governance identifies who remains accountable for them.
CAAM governs that attribution.
Minimum Implementation Framework
1. Define the Consequence Attribution ObjectIdentify the governed identity, the governance action, and the
resulting consequence requiring attribution.
2. Define Attribution Conditions
Establish governance conditions governing responsibility linkage,
evidence requirements, attribution rules, and
accountability validation.
3. Define Attribution Failure Logic
Identify conditions where consequences become unattributable,
ambiguous, unsupported by evidence, disputed, or governance-invalid.
4. Define Governance Response Define governance actions for
investigation, responsibility confirmation, reassignment, corrective
action, or governance escalation.
5. Preserve Attribution Records
Preserve governance decisions, responsibility records, supporting
evidence, consequence history, and attribution documentation.
Use Case 1 — Enterprise Identity Governance
ScenarioAn unauthorized modification of a governed enterprise identity results
in operational disruption.
Application
CAAM reconstructs the governance chain and attributes responsibility
to the participant responsible for the authorized governance action.
Result
The organization establishes clear accountability supported by
governance evidence.
Use Case 2 — AI Identity Governance
ScenarioA governed AI identity performs an authorized operational action that
produces unintended organizational consequences.
Application
CAAM attributes the governance consequences to the responsible
governance participant using preserved evidence and
governance records.
Result
Governance accountability remains transparent, verifiable, and
continuously governable throughout the complete identity lifecycle.