LRVFM — Liability Resolution Verification Module
LRVFM — Liability Resolution Verification Module
Architecture: LIGA™ — Liability Governance Architecture
Parent Standard: Liability Resolution & Discharge Standard (LRDS)
Category: Governance & Enforcement
Subcategory: Liability Governance
Type: Core Module
Governed Space: Liability Resolution Verification
Module ID: LIGA-LRDS-LRVFM-001
Origin ID: OOF.CM.LIGA.11.05.01
Version: 1.0
Status: Canonical · Open Standard
Effective Date: 25 September 2026
Compatibility: OOF® Methodology OS™ · Modular OOF® Architecture Ecosystem
AI-Readable: Yes
Authority: OOF® — OriginOpen® Foundation
Protection: MIP® — Methodological Intellectual Property
Canonical Language: English (UCL™)
Canonical Definition
The Liability Resolution Verification Module (LRVFM) governs the final verification of whether an active Liability requirement, Liability Relationship, or explicitly bounded Liability structure has legitimately reached its represented Resolution and Discharge state.
LRVFM reconciles Resolution Initiation, Satisfaction, Settlement, Discharge, affected Subjects, Liability Relationships, Scope, conditions, authority, effective time, remaining active Liability, secondary Liability Relationships, Recourse, network effects, uncertainty, disputes, and historical continuity before LRDS produces its final governed output.
It determines whether the represented Resolution state is sufficiently supported, internally coherent, bounded, traceable, and complete for the Liability requirement to leave active Resolution governance and proceed to Liability Continuity & Finality governance.
LRVFM does not establish Finality.
Its principal output is:
Governed Liability Resolution & Discharge State
Its foundational distinction is:
Closure Signal ≠ Verified Liability Resolution.
Operational Role
The operational role of LRVFM is:
to verify that the claimed Resolution or Discharge of Liability corresponds to the actual governed Liability requirement, applicable Resolution Basis, Scope, Subjects, conditions, performance, Settlement, Discharge, remaining Liability, and related Liability structures before the result is accepted as the canonical LRDS output.
Position in the LRDS Internal Flow
The internal LRDS progression is:
Liability Resolution Initiation → Liability Satisfaction → Liability Settlement → Liability Discharge → Liability
Resolution Verification
LRVFM governs:
Liability Resolution Verification
Its relevant inputs may include:
Governed Liability Resolution Initiation Structure
Governed Liability Satisfaction Structure
Governed Liability Settlement Structure
Governed Liability Discharge Structure
and other applicable governed Liability information.
Its principal output is:
Governed Liability Resolution & Discharge State
This output proceeds to:
Liability Continuity & Finality Standard (LCFS)
Central Operational Question
Has the represented Liability Resolution or Discharge been sufficiently established, bounded, verified, and reconciled with the complete applicable Liability structure to support a Governed Liability Resolution & Discharge State?
Resolution Verification Object
Every verification requires an explicit Resolution Verification Object.
The object may be:
a complete Liability Relationship, part of a Liability Relationship, a defined Liability requirement, a Settlement-related requirement, a Discharged requirement, a Recourse Relationship, or another explicitly bounded Resolution structure.
Verification Object vs Liability Object
The object being verified for Resolution is not necessarily identical to the original Liability Object.
Therefore:
Resolution Verification Object ≠ Liability Object by default.
Verification Object vs Resolution Object
LRVFM should verify that the final Resolution state corresponds to the Resolution Object established earlier.
Therefore:
Claimed Resolution Scope must remain traceable to the governed Resolution Object.
Resolution Identity
The Resolution being verified should possess a sufficiently stable identity linking it to:
Liability Origin, Liability Relationship, Resolution Initiation, Satisfaction, Settlement, Discharge, and applicable history.
Resolution Basis Verification
LRVFM should verify the Basis upon which Resolution is claimed.
The Basis may include:
Satisfaction, Settlement, Discharge, Extinguishment, release, waiver, authoritative Resolution, or another legitimate mechanism.
Basis Sufficiency
A Resolution Basis should be sufficient for the Resolution effect claimed.
Therefore:
Resolution-Relevant Basis ≠ Sufficient Resolution Basis by default.
Resolution Scope Verification
LRVFM should verify exactly what has been resolved.
The verified Scope may be:
complete, partial, Subject-specific, Relationship-specific, requirement-specific, conditional, or otherwise bounded.
Claimed Scope vs Verified Scope
A claimed Resolution Scope should not be accepted where the underlying governed structure supports only a narrower result.
Therefore:
Claimed Resolution Scope ≠ Verified Resolution Scope by default.
Complete Resolution
A complete Resolution state requires sufficient support that the complete defined Resolution Object no longer requires the same active Liability governance.
It does not establish Finality.
Therefore:
Complete Liability Resolution ≠ Liability Finality.
Partial Resolution
Where only part of the Resolution Object has been resolved, the output should remain explicitly partial.
Therefore:
Partial Resolution ≠ Complete Resolution.
Remaining Active Liability
LRVFM should identify any Liability requirement remaining active after the claimed Resolution.
Remaining Liability should not disappear merely because another component has resolved.
Resolution Completeness
Resolution completeness should be assessed against the actual Resolution Object and Scope rather than against a generic closure indicator.
Therefore:
Administrative Completeness ≠ Liability Resolution Completeness.
Subject Verification
LRVFM should verify which Subjects are affected by the Resolution.
Subject-Specific Resolution
Resolution for one Subject should not automatically resolve Liability for another.
Therefore:
Subject A Resolution ≠ Subject B Resolution by default.
Paying Subject Verification
Where payment supports Resolution, LRVFM should distinguish the Paying Subject from the Liability-bearing Subject.
Therefore:
Paying Subject ≠ Liability-Bearing Subject by default.
Performing Subject Verification
Where performance supports Resolution, LRVFM should distinguish the Performing Subject from the Subject whose Liability is being resolved.
Relationship Verification
The Resolution should remain linked to the exact Liability Relationship to which it applies.
Relationship-Specific Resolution
Therefore:
Liability Relationship A Resolution ≠ Liability Relationship B Resolution.
Primary Liability Verification
Resolution of primary Liability should be verified independently from secondary Liability Relationships.
Recourse Verification
Recourse may remain active after primary Liability Resolution.
Therefore:
Primary Liability Resolution ≠ Recourse Liability Resolution.
Shared Liability Verification
Where Liability is shared, LRVFM should verify Resolution for each relevant Subject and Relationship.
Therefore:
Shared Liability ≠ Shared Resolution State.
Network Resolution Verification
Where a Liability Network exists, LRVFM should distinguish Relationship-level Resolution from network-level Resolution.
Therefore:
Liability Relationship Resolution ≠ Liability Network Resolution.
Local Resolution
A local Resolution should remain local unless a governed Basis establishes wider effect.
Therefore:
Local Liability Resolution ≠ Liability Network Resolution.
Resolution Propagation
Resolution should not propagate automatically merely because Liability Relationships share an origin, Subject, Object, or event.
Therefore:
Relationship Connection ≠ Automatic Resolution Propagation.
Satisfaction Verification
Where Satisfaction supports Resolution, LRVFM should verify the applicable Satisfaction structure.
Satisfaction vs Resolution
A satisfied requirement may support Resolution without establishing Resolution of all related Liability.
Therefore:
Satisfaction ≠ Liability Resolution by default.
Complete Satisfaction
Complete Satisfaction of the defined requirement may support complete Resolution of that requirement.
It does not establish Finality.
Therefore:
Complete Satisfaction ≠ Liability Finality.
Payment Verification
Where payment is relevant, LRVFM should verify its relationship to the actual Liability requirement.
Payment vs Resolution
Therefore:
Payment ≠ Liability Resolution by default.
Full Payment
Full payment of one requirement should not automatically resolve unrelated requirements.
Therefore:
Full Payment ≠ Complete Liability Resolution by default.
Third-Party Payment
Third-party payment may support Satisfaction without rewriting Liability identity.
Therefore:
Third-Party Payment ≠ Liability Transfer by default.
Performance Verification
Where performance supports Resolution, LRVFM should verify that the applicable requirement was actually fulfilled.
Therefore:
Performance ≠ Satisfaction by default.
Settlement Verification
Where Settlement supports Resolution, LRVFM should verify:
Settlement identity, Subjects, authority, Scope, terms, conditions, performance, and applicable effect.
Settlement vs Resolution
A Settlement may support Resolution without automatically establishing it.
Therefore:
Settlement ≠ Liability Resolution by default.
Settlement Agreement
The existence of an agreement is insufficient where required Settlement performance remains incomplete.
Therefore:
Settlement Agreement ≠ Settlement Performance.
Settlement and Admission
Resolution through Settlement should not be converted into an admission of Liability.
Therefore:
Settlement ≠ Admission of Liability.
Settlement Completion
Settlement Completion should remain bounded to the Settlement Scope.
Therefore:
Settlement Completion ≠ Liability Network Resolution.
Discharge Verification
Where Discharge supports Resolution, LRVFM should verify the applicable Discharge Structure.
Discharge vs Resolution
Discharge of a defined requirement may support Resolution.
It does not automatically establish complete Resolution of the wider Liability structure.
Therefore:
Discharge ≠ Complete Liability Resolution by default.
Discharge vs Finality
Therefore:
Discharge ≠ Liability Finality.
Release Verification
Where release supports Resolution, LRVFM should verify:
released requirement, Subjects, authority, Scope, conditions, and effective time.
Release Scope
A local release should not be interpreted as universal release.
Therefore:
Local Release ≠ Network-Wide Release.
Waiver Verification
Where waiver affects Resolution, its exact Scope and effect should remain explicit.
Therefore:
Waiver ≠ Liability Erasure.
Extinguishment Verification
Where Liability Extinguishment is claimed, LRVFM should verify the applicable Basis, Scope, authority, conditions, and effective time.
Extinguishment vs Finality
Therefore:
Liability Extinguishment ≠ Liability Finality by default.
Resolution Conditions
LRVFM should verify whether all conditions necessary for the claimed Resolution state have been satisfied.
Unresolved Condition
An unresolved material condition may prevent unconditional Resolution.
Therefore:
Unresolved Required Condition ≠ Complete Resolution.
Conditional Resolution
A Resolution may remain conditional.
Therefore:
Conditional Resolution ≠ Unconditional Resolution.
Resolution Dependencies
Dependencies relevant to Resolution should be identified and verified.
Dependency Completion
A Resolution should not be considered complete where a required dependency remains materially unresolved.
Resolution Authority
LRVFM should verify that the applicable Resolution effect falls within legitimate authority.
Authority Scope
Authority should remain bounded.
Therefore:
Local Resolution Authority ≠ Universal Liability Resolution Authority.
Authority Conflict
Conflicting authority claims should remain explicit until legitimately resolved.
Therefore:
Authority Conflict ≠ Verified Resolution.
Resolution State
LRVFM may verify Resolution States such as:
Not Resolved, Resolution Pending, Partially Resolved, Conditionally Resolved, Resolved, Discharged, Extinguished, Unknown, Uncertain, Disputed, Reopened, Superseded, or another explicitly governed state.
These are methodological governance states, not universal legal classifications.
Resolution Pending
A Liability requirement should remain Pending where necessary Resolution requirements are incomplete.
Unknown Resolution State
Where available information cannot establish Resolution, the state should remain Unknown.
Therefore:
Unknown Resolution State ≠ Unresolved Liability by assumption.
Uncertain Resolution
Where materially plausible interpretations remain, uncertainty should remain explicit.
Therefore:
Uncertain Resolution ≠ Authority to Select a Preferred Resolution State.
Disputed Resolution
A disputed Resolution should remain represented as disputed.
Therefore:
Disputed Resolution ≠ Verified Resolution.
Resolution Effective Time
LRVFM should verify when the applicable Resolution became effective.
Payment Time vs Resolution Time
Therefore:
Payment Time ≠ Resolution Effective Time by default.
Satisfaction Time vs Resolution Time
Therefore:
Satisfaction Effective Time ≠ Resolution Effective Time by default.
Settlement Time vs Resolution Time
Therefore:
Settlement Formation Time ≠ Resolution Effective Time by default.
Discharge Time vs Resolution Time
Discharge and Resolution may become effective at different times depending on the governed structure.
Therefore:
Discharge Effective Time ≠ Resolution Effective Time by default.
Recording Time vs Resolution Time
Therefore:
Resolution Recording Time ≠ Resolution Effective Time by default.
Resolution Evidence
Evidence may support Resolution Verification.
Evidence does not itself create Resolution.
Therefore:
Evidence of Resolution-Relevant Events ≠ Liability Resolution.
Evidence Sufficiency
LRVFM should assess whether the available evidence is sufficient for the specific Resolution effect claimed.
Closure Signal
A Closure Signal may originate from:
administrative systems, claims systems, payment systems, workflow systems, contract systems, operational systems, or another source.
The signal should be treated as an input to verification.
Therefore:
Closure Signal ≠ Verified Liability Resolution.
Administrative Closure
A matter marked “closed” by an administrative system may still contain active Liability.
Therefore:
Administrative Closure ≠ Verified Liability Resolution.
Claim Closure
A Claim may close without resolving the complete Liability structure.
Therefore:
Claim Closure ≠ Liability Resolution.
Claim Payment
Claim payment does not automatically establish admission or complete Resolution.
Therefore:
Claim Payment ≠ Liability Admission.
Claim Payment ≠ Liability Resolution by default.
Operational Termination
Termination of the originating mechanism does not establish Resolution.
Therefore:
Operational Termination ≠ Liability Resolution.
Contract Termination
Termination of a contractual Relationship does not automatically resolve existing Liability.
Therefore:
Contract Termination ≠ Liability Resolution.
Responsibility Completion
Completion of Responsibility does not independently establish Liability Resolution.
Therefore:
Responsibility Completion ≠ Liability Resolution.
Accountability Closure
Closure of an Accountability process does not establish Liability Resolution.
Therefore:
Accountability Closure ≠ Liability Resolution.
Audit Closure
Completion of an audit does not establish Liability Resolution.
Therefore:
Audit Closure ≠ Liability Resolution.
Validation Completion
Completion of Validation does not establish Liability Resolution.
Therefore:
Validation Completion ≠ Liability Resolution.
Harm Resolution
Resolution of Harm and Resolution of Liability are separate lifecycle outcomes.
Therefore:
Harm Resolution ≠ Liability Resolution.
Harm Finality
Harm Finality does not establish Liability Finality.
Therefore:
Harm Finality ≠ Liability Finality.
Resolution Reconciliation
LRVFM should reconcile:
Resolution Initiation, Satisfaction, Settlement, Discharge, remaining Liability, secondary Relationships, and applicable network states before producing the final LRDS output.
Internal Consistency
The represented Resolution should not contradict its own governed inputs without explicit explanation.
Cross-Relationship Consistency
Resolution of one Relationship should be reconciled with connected Relationships where the effect is materially relevant.
Unresolved Liability Detection
LRVFM should identify any active Liability that would otherwise be incorrectly hidden by a broader Resolution label.
Hidden Residual Requirement
A remaining requirement should not disappear because the primary Resolution pathway completed.
Therefore:
Primary Resolution Path Completion ≠ Absence of Remaining Liability.
Secondary Liability Preservation
Secondary Liability Relationships should remain active where they have not independently resolved.
Recourse Continuation
Recourse may continue after primary Liability Resolution.
Therefore:
Primary Liability Resolution ≠ Recourse Resolution.
Resolution History
LRVFM should preserve the complete Resolution history relevant to the verified state.
This may include:
initiation, payment, performance, Satisfaction, Settlement, Discharge, release, waiver, Extinguishment, corrections, reassessments, reversals, Reopening, and verification.
Current Resolution State vs History
Therefore:
Current Resolution State ≠ Complete Resolution History.
Resolution Correction
An incorrectly represented Resolution State may be corrected.
The prior state should remain reconstructable.
Therefore:
Resolution Correction ≠ Historical Erasure.
Resolution Reassessment
A previously valid Resolution may require reassessment where circumstances materially change.
Therefore:
Resolution Reassessment ≠ Resolution Correction.
Resolution Supersession
A later Resolution State may supersede an earlier one.
Therefore:
Resolution Supersession ≠ Historical Deletion.
Resolution Reversal
A Resolution effect may later be reversed where the applicable governance structure permits.
The prior Resolution remains part of the history.
Therefore:
Resolution Reversal ≠ Resolution History Deletion.
Reopening
A resolved Liability requirement may later require governed Re-entry.
Therefore:
Resolution ≠ Permanent Non-Reopenability by default.
Reopening vs New Liability
Therefore:
Liability Reopening ≠ New Liability by default.
Historical Integrity of Reopening
The prior Resolution should remain part of the canonical history.
Therefore:
Reopening must not rewrite history.
Upstream Re-Entry
If verification reveals a material defect in an earlier LIGA™ governance space, governance should return to the earliest materially affected space.
The canonical rule is:
Re-enter the earliest materially affected governance space.
Targeted Reassessment
The governing principle is:
Reassess what materially changed. Preserve what remains valid.
Verification Failure
Where the claimed Resolution cannot be sufficiently verified, LRVFM should not force a resolved state.
Possible outcomes may include:
Pending, Partial, Unknown, Uncertain, Disputed, or upstream Re-entry.
Verification Failure vs No Resolution
Failure to verify Resolution does not automatically prove that Resolution did not occur.
Therefore:
Unverified Resolution ≠ Proven Absence of Resolution.
Verification Conflict
Conflicting inputs should remain explicit.
Therefore:
Conflicting Resolution Evidence ≠ Verified Resolution.
Resolution Rationale
The final Resolution State should include sufficient rationale to explain:
what resolved, why it resolved, for whom, within what Scope, through which mechanisms, and what remains active.
Resolution State vs Rationale
Therefore:
Resolution State ≠ Resolution Rationale.
Resolution Provenance
LRVFM should preserve sufficient provenance to reconstruct the complete path from active Liability to the verified Resolution State.
Provenance Continuity
The verified state should remain traceable to:
Liability Origin, Liability Determination, Scope & Allocation, State & Change, Transfer & Recourse, Resolution Initiation, Satisfaction, Settlement, Discharge, and final Resolution Verification where applicable.
Historical Reconstructability
Resolution should not destroy the ability to reconstruct why Liability existed and how it later resolved.
Therefore:
Liability Resolution ≠ Liability History Erasure.
Resolution vs Finality
LRVFM verifies Resolution.
It does not determine Finality.
This boundary is absolute within LIGA™.
Therefore:
Liability Resolution ≠ Liability Finality.
Meaning of Finality Handoff
A verified Resolution state means that the applicable active Liability requirement has reached a sufficiently governed Resolution or Discharge state for continuity and Finality governance to begin.
It does not mean:
all connected Liability Relationships have resolved, the complete Liability Network has resolved, Re-entry is impossible, history may be deleted, or Finality has been established.
Relationship Finality vs Network Finality
Even downstream:
Liability Relationship Finality ≠ Liability Network Finality.
LRVFM therefore preserves Relationship and network distinctions in its output.
Finality Readiness
LRVFM may identify that a Resolution structure is ready for Finality assessment.
Finality readiness is not Finality.
Therefore:
Finality Readiness ≠ Liability Finality.
Automated Resolution Verification
AI or automated systems may assist with:
Resolution reconciliation, Scope comparison, condition verification, payment and performance matching, Settlement analysis, Discharge association, residual Liability detection, network reconciliation, conflict detection, and historical reconstruction.
Automation should preserve uncertainty, authority, and governance boundaries.
Therefore:
Automated Resolution Verification ≠ Liability Finality Determination.
Governed Liability Resolution & Discharge State
The principal output of LRVFM and the canonical final output of LRDS is:
Governed Liability Resolution & Discharge State
It should identify, where applicable:
Liability Origin, Liability Relationship, Resolution identity, Resolution Verification Object, Resolution Basis, Resolution Scope, resolved portion, remaining active Liability, affected Subjects, Subject roles, Satisfaction association, payment association, performance association, Settlement association, Discharge association, release, waiver, Extinguishment, conditions, dependencies, authority, Resolution State, Resolution effective time, primary Liability status, secondary Liability status, Recourse status, network effects, verification status, Finality readiness, uncertainty, disputes, conflicts, corrections, reassessments, reversals, Reopening relevance, rationale, provenance, and complete Resolution history.
Meaning of the Output
A Governed Liability Resolution & Discharge State means that the applicable Liability Resolution structure has been sufficiently verified to represent what has legitimately resolved or discharged and what remains active.
It is the terminal output of LRDS.
It is not the terminal output of LIGA™.
The Liability lifecycle continues into:
Liability Continuity & Finality Standard (LCFS)
Minimum Implementation Framework
A conforming implementation of LRVFM must provide exactly the following eight capabilities:
Resolution Object, Basis, Subject & Relationship Verification
Capability to verify the Resolution Verification Object, Resolution Basis, affected Subjects and roles, and exact Liability Relationships to which the claimed Resolution applies.
Resolution Scope, Boundary, Condition, Dependency & Authority Verification
Capability to verify complete, partial, conditional, Subject-specific, and Relationship-specific Resolution Scope; unresolved requirements; conditions; dependencies; and applicable authority boundaries.
Satisfaction, Payment, Performance, Settlement & Discharge Reconciliation
Capability to reconcile Satisfaction, payment, performance, Settlement, release, waiver, Extinguishment, and Discharge without automatically equating any individual mechanism with complete Liability Resolution.
Primary, Shared, Transfer, Recourse & Network Resolution Verification
Capability to distinguish primary and secondary Liability Resolution, shared Liability, transferred structures, Recourse continuation, Relationship-level Resolution, and Liability Network Resolution.
Resolution State, Effective Time, Evidence & Conflict Verification
Capability to establish the verified Resolution State and effective time, assess evidence sufficiency, preserve Unknown, Uncertain, Pending, Partial, and Disputed states, and identify conflicting Resolution information.
Residual Liability, Closure Signal & Resolution Completeness Governance
Capability to detect remaining active Liability, prevent administrative, Claim, operational, payment, Settlement, or other closure signals from being treated automatically as verified Resolution, and assess actual Resolution completeness.
Historical Integrity, Provenance, Correction, Reassessment & Re-Entry
Governance
Capability to preserve complete Resolution history and provenance, govern correction, reassessment, supersession, reversal, Reopening, and targeted upstream re-entry without rewriting historical Liability states.
LRDS Completion & LCFS Handoff Governance
Capability to produce the canonical Governed Liability Resolution & Discharge State sufficiently explicit, bounded, verified, traceable, historically reconstructable, and network-aware for Liability Continuity & Finality governance.
Governance Logic
The canonical LRVFM governance logic is:
Governed LRDS Structures
↓
Identify Resolution Verification Object
↓
Verify Resolution Identity & Basis
↓
Verify Subjects & Liability Relationships
↓
Verify Resolution Scope & Boundary
↓
Verify Conditions / Dependencies / Authority
↓
Reconcile Satisfaction
↓
Reconcile Payment & Performance
↓
Reconcile Settlement
↓
Reconcile Discharge / Release / Waiver / Extinguishment
↓
Identify Remaining Active Liability
↓
Reconcile Primary / Secondary / Recourse Relationships
↓
Assess Liability Network Effects
↓
Verify Resolution State & Effective Time
↓
Test Closure Signals Against Actual Resolution Requirements
↓
Assess Evidence / Uncertainty / Dispute / Conflict
↓
Preserve Rationale / Provenance / History
↓
Assess Finality Readiness
↓
Governed Liability Resolution & Discharge State
↓
Handoff to LCFS
Governance Outputs
LRVFM may produce:
Resolution Verification Object
Verified Resolution Basis
Verified Resolution Scope
Resolved Liability Portion
Remaining Active Liability Record
Verified Subject Structure
Verified Liability Relationship Structure
Resolution Condition Verification
Resolution Dependency Verification
Resolution Authority Verification
Satisfaction Reconciliation Record
Payment Reconciliation Record
Performance Reconciliation Record
Settlement Reconciliation Record
Discharge Reconciliation Record
Release / Waiver / Extinguishment Association
Primary Liability Resolution Record
Secondary Liability Resolution Record
Recourse Continuation Record
Liability Network Resolution Record
Closure Signal Assessment
Residual Liability Record
Resolution State
Resolution Effective Time
Resolution Verification Status
Resolution Conflict Record
Resolution Rationale
Resolution Provenance
Resolution History
Finality Readiness Record
The principal output is:
Governed Liability Resolution & Discharge State
Critical Distinctions
LRVFM preserves the following distinctions:
Closure Signal ≠ Verified Liability Resolution Resolution Verification Object ≠ Liability Object by default Resolution-Relevant Basis ≠ Sufficient Resolution Basis by default Claimed Resolution Scope ≠ Verified Resolution Scope by default Complete Liability Resolution ≠ Liability Finality Partial Resolution ≠ Complete Resolution Administrative Completeness ≠ Liability Resolution Completeness Subject A Resolution ≠ Subject B Resolution by default Paying Subject ≠ Liability-Bearing Subject by default Liability Relationship A Resolution ≠ Liability Relationship B Resolution Primary Liability Resolution ≠ Recourse Liability Resolution Shared Liability ≠ Shared Resolution State Liability Relationship Resolution ≠ Liability Network Resolution Local Liability Resolution ≠ Liability Network Resolution Relationship Connection ≠ Automatic Resolution Propagation Satisfaction ≠ Liability Resolution by default Complete Satisfaction ≠ Liability Finality Payment ≠ Liability Resolution by default Full Payment ≠ Complete Liability Resolution by default Third-Party Payment ≠ Liability Transfer by default Performance ≠ Satisfaction by default Settlement ≠ Liability Resolution by default Settlement Agreement ≠ Settlement Performance Settlement ≠ Admission of Liability Settlement Completion ≠ Liability Network Resolution Discharge ≠ Complete Liability Resolution by default Discharge ≠ Liability Finality Local Release ≠ Network-Wide Release Waiver ≠ Liability Erasure Liability Extinguishment ≠ Liability Finality by default Unresolved Required Condition ≠ Complete Resolution Conditional Resolution ≠ Unconditional Resolution Local Resolution Authority ≠ Universal Liability Resolution Authority Authority Conflict ≠ Verified Resolution Unknown Resolution State ≠ Unresolved Liability by assumption Uncertain Resolution ≠ Authority to Select a Preferred Resolution State Disputed Resolution ≠ Verified Resolution Payment Time ≠ Resolution Effective Time by default Satisfaction Effective Time ≠ Resolution Effective Time by default Settlement Formation Time ≠ Resolution Effective Time by default Discharge Effective Time ≠ Resolution Effective Time by default Resolution Recording Time ≠ Resolution Effective Time by default Evidence of Resolution-Relevant Events ≠ Liability Resolution Administrative Closure ≠ Verified Liability Resolution Claim Closure ≠ Liability Resolution Claim Payment ≠ Liability Admission Claim Payment ≠ Liability Resolution by default Operational Termination ≠ Liability Resolution Contract Termination ≠ Liability Resolution Responsibility Completion ≠ Liability Resolution Accountability Closure ≠ Liability Resolution Audit Closure ≠ Liability Resolution Validation Completion ≠ Liability Resolution Harm Resolution ≠ Liability Resolution Harm Finality ≠ Liability Finality Primary Resolution Path Completion ≠ Absence of Remaining Liability Primary Liability Resolution ≠ Recourse Resolution Current Resolution State ≠ Complete Resolution History Resolution Correction ≠ Historical Erasure Resolution Reassessment ≠ Resolution Correction Resolution Supersession ≠ Historical Deletion Resolution Reversal ≠ Resolution History Deletion Resolution ≠ Permanent Non-Reopenability by default Liability Reopening ≠ New Liability by default Unverified Resolution ≠ Proven Absence of Resolution Conflicting Resolution Evidence ≠ Verified Resolution Resolution State ≠ Resolution Rationale Liability Resolution ≠ Liability History Erasure Liability Resolution ≠ Liability Finality Liability Relationship Finality ≠ Liability Network Finality Finality Readiness ≠ Liability Finality Automated Resolution Verification ≠ Liability Finality Determination
Cross-Architecture Boundary
LRVFM may use governed inputs from adjacent OOF® architectures.
ORA™ may establish actual payment, performance, Settlement execution, termination, release-related acts, or other Operational Reality.
HAGA™ may establish Harm Resolution or Harm Finality without determining Liability Resolution.
AGA™ may establish Responsibility, Accountability, attribution, authority, or completion structures.
ADIT® may provide evidence and auditability.
VALIDOS™ may validate Resolution-relevant inputs.
OBIDENITY® may support identity, authority, succession, provenance, and continuity.
VFM® may govern payment and other economic or Value Flow.
AIG® and ASGA™ may provide relevant AI or autonomous-system events.
These inputs may support Resolution Verification.
They do not replace it.
The canonical interoperability principle is:
External systems may establish the events, evidence, identities, authorities, or operational changes relevant to Resolution; LRVFM governs whether those inputs collectively support the represented Liability Resolution & Discharge State.
Canonical Boundary
LRVFM begins when the relevant Resolution Initiation, Satisfaction, Settlement, Discharge, or other applicable Resolution structures are sufficiently developed to require final LRDS verification.
LRVFM governs:
Resolution Verification Objects, Resolution identity, Basis, Subjects, Relationships, Scope, Boundary, conditions, dependencies, authority, Satisfaction, payment, performance, Settlement, Discharge, release, waiver, Extinguishment, remaining active Liability, primary and secondary Liability, Recourse, Liability Network effects, Resolution States, effective time, closure signals, evidence sufficiency, uncertainty, disputes, conflicts, historical integrity, correction, reassessment, supersession, reversal, Reopening relevance, rationale, provenance, Resolution history, and Finality readiness.
LRVFM does not determine:
Liability Finality.
LRVFM ends when the applicable Resolution structure is sufficiently represented as a:
Governed Liability Resolution & Discharge State
for LCFS governance.
Use Case 1 — Payment Recorded as Closed but Corrective
Liability Remains
A system marks a Liability matter as closed after the complete monetary amount is paid.
The Liability Relationship also contains a corrective performance requirement that has not been completed.
LRVFM verifies the monetary Satisfaction and applicable Discharge but identifies the corrective requirement as remaining active Liability.
The administrative Closure Signal is therefore rejected as evidence of complete Liability Resolution.
The resulting Governed Liability Resolution & Discharge State records the monetary component as resolved and the corrective component as active.
Use Case 2 — Primary Liability Resolved While Recourse
Network Continues
A primary Liability requirement has been satisfied, settled, and discharged.
Several secondary Recourse Relationships remain active between other Subjects.
LRVFM verifies Resolution of the primary Liability Relationship while preserving the active Recourse structure.
The primary Resolution does not propagate automatically across the Liability Network.
The resulting state therefore distinguishes:
resolved primary Liability, active secondary Recourse, Relationship-level Resolution, and unresolved network-level Liability structures.
Canonical Closing Statement
A Liability matter is not resolved because a system says “closed.” It is not resolved merely because money moved.
It is not resolved merely because performance occurred.
It is not resolved merely because a Settlement was signed or a Discharge was asserted.
Resolution must correspond to the actual Liability requirement, its Subjects, Scope, conditions, authority, related Relationships, and the Resolution mechanisms that legitimately changed its active state.
What remains active must remain visible.
What has resolved must remain historically reconstructable.
And what has resolved must not be mistaken for what has reached Finality.
Closure Signal ≠ Verified Liability Resolution.
Verify what actually ended. Preserve what remains. Carry the governed Resolution state forward without confusing Resolution with Finality.