Structural Dependency Integrity Module (SDIM)
OOF™ Origin Open Foundation™
Independent Methodological Authority
OriginID: OOF-OID-INTEGROS-STIS-SDIM-2026-07-17-0004
Architecture Ecosystem: Structured Reality Standards™
Architecture Family: INTEGROS® — Integrity Governance Architecture
Parent Standard: Structural Integrity Standard (STIS)
Operational Layer: Meta-Integrity Governance Layer
Category: Governance & Enforcement
Subcategory: Integrity Governance
Type: Parent Standard Module
Governed Space: Structural Dependency Integrity
Version: 1.0
Status: Canonical · Open Module
Origin Date: 17 July 2026
Compatibility: OOF Methodology OS · GOA™ · OBIDENITY® · ART™ · ORA™ · AGA™ · AIG® · CLIA® ·
MGIA™ · ASGA™
AI-Readable: Yes
Authority: OOF®
Protection: MIP™ — Methodological Intellectual Property
Canonical Language: English (UCL)
Minimum Implementation Framework
1. Define Structural DependenciesIdentify every dependency between structural components, including functional,
operational, organizational, technical, governance, and external dependencies
that influence structural integrity.
2. Define Dependency Integrity Requirements
Establish the governance conditions that every dependency must satisfy,
including legitimacy, availability, consistency, traceability, resilience, and
continuity.
3. Define Dependency Failure Logic
Identify the conditions under which a dependency becomes unavailable, invalid,
inconsistent, broken, unauthorized, obsolete, or otherwise incapable of
supporting structural integrity.
4. Define Governance Response
Define governance actions for validating, replacing, mitigating, removing,
restructuring, or approving dependency changes whenever dependency integrity
is compromised.
5. Preserve Dependency Records
Preserve dependency maps, governance approvals, dependency changes, validation
history, supporting evidence, and lifecycle records necessary to demonstrate
dependency integrity.
Example Use Cases
Use Case 1 — Financial Services Platform
ScenarioA financial institution operates multiple interconnected services, including
customer identity, transaction processing, fraud detection, and regulatory
reporting, all of which depend on one another.
Application
SDIM identifies and governs every dependency between these services, ensuring
that changes to one service do not unintentionally compromise the structural
integrity of the entire platform.
Result
The institution maintains resilient and transparent service dependencies,
reducing operational risk while preserving structural integrity across the
complete financial ecosystem.
Use Case 2 — Autonomous Multi-Agent System
ScenarioA fleet of autonomous agents depends on shared memory services, identity
infrastructure, orchestration components, external sensors, and governance
policies to coordinate operations.
Application
SDIM maps and continuously validates every operational and governance
dependency, ensuring that dependency failures are detected and managed before
they affect the integrity of the system.
Result
The autonomous ecosystem maintains dependable structural relationships,
allowing agents to operate safely and consistently despite changes in
individual components or supporting infrastructure.