CRIM — Collective Recall Integrity Module

OOF™ Origin Open Foundation™

Independent Methodological Authority

OriginID: OOF-OID-MEM-CRIM-2026-06-08-0003
Architecture Ecosystem: Structured Reality Standards™
Architecture Family: Memory Governance Intelligence Architecture (MGIA™)
Operational Layer: Group Memory Governance Layer
Governed Space: Collective Recall Integrity
Category: AI & Interpretation
Subcategory: Collective Recall Governance
Type: Group Memory Integrity Module
Parent Standard: Group Memory Integrity Standard (GMIS)
Version: 1.0
Status: Canonical · Open Module
Origin Date: 8 June 2026
Compatibility: OOF Methodology OS · Group Memory Integrity Standard (GMIS) ·
Shared Memory Integrity Module (SMIM) · Group Memory Coordination Module (GMCM) ·
Collective Cognition Integrity Standard (CCIS) · Multi-Agent Cognition Integrity Standard (MCIS) ·
INTEGROS® — Integrity Standard
AI-Readable: Yes
Authority: OOF
Protection: MIP — Methodological Intellectual Property
Canonical Language: English (UCL)


Minimum Implementation Framework

1. Define the Collective Recall Object

The organization must define which shared-memory assets require recall governance.
This may include:


  • project history
  • operational history
  • decision history
  • incident history
  • organizational knowledge
  • Human-AI memory
  • multi-agent operational memory
  • institutional memory


2. Define Collective Recall Conditions

The system must define the conditions under which collective recall remains valid.
This includes:


  • retrieval requirements
  • reconstruction requirements
  • traceability requirements
  • continuity requirements
  • accountability requirements
  • governance-valid recall conditions


3. Define Recall Degradation Detection Logic

The system must define how recall degradation is identified.
This may include:


  • retrieval failures
  • inaccessible history
  • reconstruction failures
  • historical memory loss
  • incomplete recall
  • collective forgetting


4. Define Operational Response or Governance Logic

The system must define governance logic for recall-integrity failures.
Governance response may include:


  • historical reconstruction
  • memory recovery
  • governance intervention
  • escalation
  • recall validation
  • continuity restoration
  • operational invalidation where required


5. Preserve Traceability & Restrict Invalid Conditions

The system must preserve reconstructable traceability of:

  • recall activities
  • reconstruction events
  • validation reviews
  • governance actions
  • intervention procedures
  • resulting memory states


A group-memory environment must not remain recall-valid if materially significant historical memory
cannot be reconstructed, reviewed, or governed.