CLIA® Complete Standards & Modules Index

Cognitive Governance Intelligence Architecture

Official Cognitive Governance Map for Autonomous and Intelligent Systems

This document serves as the official OOF® cognition governance map and structural index
used for cognition space identification, cognition governance classification, cognition diagnostics,
cognition architecture navigation, and cognition problem placement
across autonomous and intelligent systems.

CLIA® consists of 10 Parent Standards and 50 Core Modules.

Additional standards and modules may be added when new governable cognition spaces are identified.
However, the standards and modules listed below form the core structural backbone of CLIA® 3.0.

1. Cognitive Integrity Standard (CIS)

Governed Space
Cognitive Integrity

Core Question
Is the cognition valid?

Modules

TVIM — Truth Validation Integrity Module
CBIM — Cognitive Boundary Integrity Module
RCIM — Reasoning Consistency Integrity Module
CCIM — Cognitive Continuity Integrity Module
SCIM — Structural Coherence Integrity Module

2. Human Cognition Integrity Standard (HCIS)

Governed Space
Human Cognition Integrity

Core Question
How does human cognition remain reliable?

Modules

HMIRM — Human Metacognitive Integrity & Regulation Module
JOIM — Judgment Ownership Integrity Module
RAIM — Reality Alignment Integrity Module
CAIM — Cognitive Autonomy Integrity Module
DRIM — Decision Responsibility Integrity Module

3. Agent Cognition Integrity Standard (ACIS)

Governed Space
Agent Cognition Integrity

Core Question
How does an autonomous agent maintain valid cognition?

Modules

CTIM — Cognitive Traceability Integrity Module
AAIM — Authority Alignment Integrity Module
TCIM — Tool Cognition Integrity Module
OIIM — Operational Interpretability Integrity Module
ARIM — Autonomous Reliability Integrity Module

4. Multi-Agent Cognition Integrity Standard (MCIS)

Governed Space
Multi-Agent Cognition Integrity

Core Question
How do multiple agents think together?

Modules

CSIM — Cognitive Synchronization Integrity Module
CCIM — Cognitive Coordination Integrity Module
DCIM — Delegated Cognition Integrity Module
CCFIM — Cognitive Conflict Integrity Module
COIM — Collective Outcome Integrity Module

5. Cognitive Interpretation Integrity Standard (CIIS)

Governed Space
Cognitive Interpretation Integrity

Core Question
How is meaning formed and understood?

Modules

SCIM — Signal Cognition Integrity Module
CCIM — Context Cognition Integrity Module
ICIM — Intent Cognition Integrity Module
ACIM — Ambiguity Cognition Integrity Module
MCIM — Meaning Construction Integrity Module

6. Cognitive Reasoning Integrity Standard (CRIS)

Governed Space
Cognitive Reasoning Integrity

Core Question
How does the system reason?

Modules

IIM — Inference Integrity Module
AIM — Assumption Integrity Module
EEIM — Evidence Evaluation Integrity Module
LCIM — Logical Consistency Integrity Module
CJIM — Conclusion Justification Integrity Module

7. Cognitive Reality Modeling Standard (CRMS)

Governed Space
Cognitive Reality Modeling

Core Question
How does cognition model reality?

Modules

RRIM — Reality Representation Integrity Module
MAIM — Model Alignment Integrity Module
MADIM — Model Adaptation Integrity Module
RDIM — Reality Drift Integrity Module
PRIM — Predictive Reality Integrity Module

8. Collective Cognition Integrity Standard (CCIS)

Governed Space
Collective Cognition Integrity

Core Question
How do groups think together?

Modules

OCIM — Organizational Cognition Integrity Module
ICIM — Institutional Cognition Integrity Module
DCIM — Distributed Cognition Integrity Module
CFIM — Consensus Formation Integrity Module
CAIM — Collective Accountability Integrity Module

9. Human-AI Cognition Integrity Standard (HAICS)

Governed Space
Human-AI Cognition Integrity

Core Question
How do humans and AI think together?

Modules

SCIM — Shared Cognition Integrity Module
ACM — Augmented Cognition Module
CAIM — Cognitive Authority Integrity Module
HCSM — Human-AI Cognitive Synchronization Module
TRCM — Trust & Reliance Cognition Module

10. Cognitive Evolution Governance Standard (CEGS)

Governed Space
Cognitive Evolution Governance

Core Question
How may cognition evolve safely?

Modules

LIM — Learning Integrity Module
AIM — Adaptation Integrity Module
CEIM — Capability Evolution Integrity Module
CTIM — Cognitive Transformation Integrity Module
EAIM — Evolution Accountability Integrity Module

CLIA® Architecture Summary

Parent Standards: 10

Core Modules: 50

Core Governed Spaces

Cognitive Integrity
Human Cognition Integrity
Agent Cognition Integrity
Multi-Agent Cognition Integrity
Cognitive Interpretation Integrity
Cognitive Reasoning Integrity
Cognitive Reality Modeling
Collective Cognition Integrity
Human-AI Cognition Integrity
Cognitive Evolution Governance

CIS → Is the cognition valid?

HCIS → How does human cognition remain reliable?

ACIS → How does an autonomous agent maintain valid cognition?

MCIS → How do multiple agents think together?

CIIS → How is meaning formed and understood?

CRIS → How does the system reason?

CRMS → How does cognition model reality?

CCIS → How do groups think together?

HAICS → How do humans and AI think together?

CEGS → How may cognition evolve safely?

Architectural Position

CLIA® governs the complete cognition lifecycle.

The architecture progresses:

Cognition Integrity → Human Cognition → Agent Cognition → Multi-Agent Cognition →
Interpretation → Reasoning → Reality Modeling → Collective Cognition →
Human-AI Cognition → Cognitive Evolution

Together these standards govern how cognition remains valid throughout
cognition formation, interpretation, reasoning, reality modeling, collaboration,
adaptation, and evolution.

Canonical Principle

CLIA® does not govern what a system does.
CLIA® governs how cognition itself remains valid while the system thinks,
interprets, reasons, models reality, collaborates, learns, adapts, and evolves.