The Value Reference Module (VARM) governs how Value
Association
OOF™ Origin Open Foundation™
Independent Methodological Authority
Architecture Ecosystem: Structured Reality Standards™
Architecture Family: TREGA™ — Tax-Relevant Event Governance Architecture™
Parent Standard: TRVAS — Tax-Relevant Value Association Standard
Module: VARM — Value Reference Module
Operational Layer: Value Reference Governance Layer
Category: Governance & Enforcement
Subcategory: Tax-Relevant Event Governance
Type: Core Module
Governed Space: Value Reference
Origin ID: TREGA-TRVAS-VARM-002
Version: 1.0
Status: Canonical · Open Standard
Effective Date: 1 September 2026
AI-Readable: Yes
Authority: OOF®
Protection: MIP® — Methodological Intellectual Property
Canonical Language: UCL — Universal Canonical Language
Canonical Definition
The Value Reference Module (VARM) governs how Value AssociationCandidates identified by VAIM are connected to stable,
distinguishable, reconstructable, and interoperable value
references within a Tax-Relevant Event.
VARM establishes the reference structure through which TREGA™ can
consistently identify which governed value object, value result,
or value representation is being associated with the event
without redefining the value itself.
Its principal task is: Governed Value Association Candidate
↓
Governed Value Reference
VARM does not determine what happened to value.
It does not determine whether value increased, decreased,
transferred, developed, degraded, was nullified, restored, or
extinguished.
It does not determine the legal or tax meaning of the referenced
value.
Its foundational distinction is: Value Reference ≠ Value
DeterminationOperational Role
Once VAIM identifies potentially relevant value information,
TREGA™ requires a stable method for referring to that value
throughout subsequent governance.
Without a governed reference layer, the same value may appear
under: different transaction identifiers; different invoice
lines; different account entries; different currencies; different
blockchain transaction references; different asset identifiers;
different ERP records; different system-specific IDs; different
machine-generated references; or different representations across
organizations.
Conversely, similar references may represent different values.
VARM creates the governed reference structure needed to keep
these representations distinguishable and traceable.
Internal Module Flow
TRVAS operates through:VAIM — Value Association Identification
→ VARM — Value Reference→ VACM — Value Change Association
→ VASM — Value State Association
→ VATM — Value Association Traceability
→ Governed Value-Associated Event
VARM receives the Governed Value Association Candidate Set from
VAIM.
Its output provides the stable reference structure required by
the downstream TRVAS modules.
Operational Transition
The canonical VARM transition is:Governed Value Association Candidate Set
→ Value Reference Governance→ Governed Value Reference Set
A Governed Value Reference establishes which value object,
result, or representation subsequent TRVAS governance is
referring to.
It does not establish the legal meaning or tax treatment of that
value.
Operational Space
VARM governs: Value Reference establishment; referencedifferentiation; reference normalization; source-reference
preservation; multi-source reference linkage; reference
equivalence qualification; reference non-equivalence; reference
hierarchy; reference granularity; reference stability; reference
substitution; reference versioning; reference ambiguity;
reference conflict; reference interoperability; and reference
readiness for downstream TRVAS governance.
Operational Scope
VARM may govern value references originating from: VFM®; ERPsystems; accounting systems; banking systems; payment
infrastructure; invoices; procurement systems; marketplaces;
digital platforms; blockchain networks; digital-asset systems;
smart contracts; industrial systems; energy systems; logistics;
AI agents; autonomous systems; machine networks; and other
legitimate operational or governed sources.
VARM remains neutral to the technology or data model producing
the reference.
Governed Value Reference
A Governed Value Reference is a stable governance-level referencethrough which a specific value object, value result, or value
representation can be distinguished within TRVAS.
It permits subsequent governance to answer:
Which value are we referring to?
without answering:
What is the final legal or tax meaning of that value?
Therefore: Governed Value Reference ≠ Tax
ValuationSource Value Reference
Operational systems may already provide value identifiers.Examples include: transaction ID; invoice-line ID; asset ID;
ledger-entry ID; payment ID; wallet transaction reference; token
identifier; accounting reference; product reference;
resource-allocation reference; or machine-generated value
identifier.
VARM may preserve these as Source Value References.
However: Source Value Reference ≠ Governed
Value Reference by Default
A source identifier becomes part of the governed referencestructure only through appropriate qualification.
Canonical Reference
Where several operational references describe the same governedvalue, VARM may establish a common governance-level reference
through which those representations remain linked.
The purpose is not to erase the source identifiers.
The canonical reference provides a stable governance anchor while
preserving the underlying source references.
Therefore:
Canonical Reference ≠ Source Reference Replacement.
Reference Differentiation
VARM shall distinguish separate value references where availableinformation supports their independence.
Similar numeric values or descriptions do not establish
equivalence.
Therefore:
Same Amount ≠ Same Value Reference
Same Currency ≠ Same Value Reference
Same Participant ≠ Same Value Reference
Same Timestamp ≠ Same Value Reference
Similar Description ≠ Same Value Reference
Reference equivalence must be governed rather than assumed.Reference Equivalence
Multiple records may legitimately represent the same underlyingvalue.
VARM may establish governed reference equivalence where
sufficient support exists.
For example:
ERP Record A Invoice Line B Bank
Settlement C
may refer to the same underlying value relationship.However: Multiple References ≠ Multiple
Values by Default
Equivalence must remain qualified where uncertainty exists.Reference Non-Equivalence
Records that appear similar may represent distinct values.Two payments of the same amount may relate to separate events.
Two identical digital assets may represent separate governed
value objects.
Two invoice lines may contain identical descriptions but refer to
different economic components.
Therefore: Reference Similarity ≠ Value
Equivalence
VARM shall preserve distinction where equivalence cannotlegitimately be established.
Reference Granularity
Value may be represented at different levels.For example:
Invoice
→ Invoice Component
→ Invoice Line
→ Line Component
or:
Digital Asset Portfolio
→ Asset Class→ Asset
→ Asset Unit
VARM shall preserve the level of reference necessary for the
governed Value Association.
Therefore: Aggregate Reference ≠ Component
Reference
A reference shall not be treated as more granular than theunderlying information supports.
Composite Value Reference
One event may involve a value structure composed of severaldistinct components.
VARM may establish a composite reference structure where the
components legitimately belong together while remaining
individually distinguishable.
The canonical structure may be:
Composite Value Reference
→ Component A→ Component B
→ Component C
However:
Composite Reference ≠ Single Indivisible Value by Default.
Reference Hierarchy
Where value references exist at multiple levels, VARM maypreserve their relationship.
For example:
Settlement Reference
→ Transaction References→ Value Components
or:
Asset Bundle
→ Individual Asset ReferencesThe hierarchy represents reference structure.
It does not determine Value Ownership, Tax Base, or legal
classification.
Multi-Source Reference Linkage
The same value may be represented across several systems.VARM shall permit governed linkage among those representations.
Example:
Commerce Platform Reference
↔ ERP Reference↔ Payment Reference
↔ Bank Reference
↔ Governed Value Reference
This can create interoperability without requiring every system
to use the same internal identifier.
Reference Normalization
Different systems may use incompatible reference formats.VARM may normalize those representations for governance purposes
while preserving their original forms.
Normalization shall not alter the substantive meaning of the
underlying value.
Therefore: Reference Normalization ≠ Value
TransformationReference Stability
A Governed Value Reference should remain sufficiently stablethroughout TRVAS governance.
Changes in surrounding system identifiers shall not automatically
create a new governed value reference.
Therefore:
Source Identifier Change ≠ New Governed Value by Default.
The continuity of the reference must be assessed independently.
Reference Substitution
An operational source may replace one identifier with another.VARM shall preserve the relationship between prior and subsequent
references where they represent the same underlying value.
Therefore:
Reference Substitution ≠ Value Replacement by Default.
Historical reference paths should remain reconstructable.
Reference Versioning
Some value representations evolve.An estimate may later be updated.
A provisional settlement reference may become final.
A digital record may receive a subsequent version.
VARM may preserve version relationships without treating every
version as a separate value.
Therefore:
New Reference Version ≠ New Value by Default.
Whether the underlying value itself changed belongs to the
appropriate value-governance mechanism.
Reference Correction
A source reference may be corrected because of error.VARM shall support correction without silently erasing the prior
reference history. Reference Correction ≠ Historical Erasure
The corrected structure should remain reconstructable where
governance requires it.
Reference Ambiguity
It may be unclear which value a source identifier represents.VARM shall preserve ambiguity rather than arbitrarily linking the
reference.
Therefore: Reference Ambiguity ≠
Permission to Assume Equivalence
Where ambiguity cannot be sufficiently resolved, the governancestate shall remain qualified or unresolved.
Reference Conflict
Different sources may assert incompatible referencerelationships.
For example:
one system may associate a settlement with Invoice A while
another associates it with Invoice B.
VARM shall preserve material conflict until sufficiently
resolved.
Therefore: Reference Conflict ≠ Permission for Convenient
LinkageMissing Reference
Economically relevant value may exist even where no usable
operational identifier is available.
VARM shall not assume that missing source identification means
absence of value.
Therefore: Missing Source Reference ≠ No
Value
Where permitted by governance, a governance-level reference maybe established from sufficiently supported information while
preserving the missing-source condition.
Technical Identifier
A technical identifier may assist reference governance.However, technical uniqueness does not establish economic
uniqueness.
Therefore: Unique Technical ID ≠ Unique
Economic Value by Default
This distinction is particularly important in blockchain,tokenized, machine-generated, and distributed systems.
Blockchain References
Blockchain systems may provide: transaction hashes; walletaddresses; token IDs; contract addresses; block references;
output references; or protocol-specific identifiers.
VARM may consume these references.
However:
Transaction Hash ≠ Economic Value Reference by Default.
One transaction may contain several value relationships.
One economic value relationship may also span multiple
transactions.
VARM therefore preserves the distinction between technical ledger
references and governed value references.
Token Reference
A token identifier may identify a digital representation.It does not automatically establish the complete economic value
being governed.
Therefore:
Token ID ≠ Governed Economic Value by Default.
Likewise:
Wallet Address ≠ Value Owner.
Ownership remains outside VARM.
Banking and Payment References
Banks and payment systems may provide highly reliable transactionidentifiers.
VARM may use them as source references.
However:
Payment Identifier ≠ Complete Event Value Reference by Default.
A payment may settle: one event; several events; part of an
event; an earlier obligation; or a composite value structure.
The reference relationship must therefore remain governed.
Invoice References
An invoice number may represent an aggregate commercial documentrather than one value.
VARM shall permit references below the invoice level where
necessary.
Therefore:
Invoice Reference ≠ Single Value Reference by Default.
Invoice lines and components may require separate governed
references.
Machine-Generated References
Autonomous systems may create value-related references withouthuman involvement.
Examples include: resource-allocation IDs; machine-service IDs;
compute-consumption references; autonomous procurement
references; energy-exchange identifiers; agent transaction IDs;
or machine settlement references.
VARM shall support these references without requiring a
human-created invoice or account entry.
Therefore: Machine-Generated Reference ≠
Invalid Value Reference
The reference must still satisfy normal governance requirements.Reference and Value State
VARM establishes which value is being referenced.It does not determine the state of that value.
Therefore: Value Reference ≠ Value State
VASM owns Event–Value State Association within TRVAS.VFM® owns the underlying Value State governance.
Reference and Value Change
A stable Value Reference may persist while value changes.Therefore: Value Reference ≠ Value Change
VACM governs the association between governed Value Changes andthe event.
VFM® owns the underlying Value Change governance.
Reference and Event Participation
A Value Reference may contain or be linked to participantinformation.
VARM shall not infer participation solely from the reference.
Therefore:
Value Reference ≠ Participant Determination.
TREPS remains authoritative for Event Participation.
Reference and Ownership
A Value Reference may be associated with an actor, account,wallet, organization, or machine.
This does not establish legal ownership.
Therefore: Value Reference ≠ Ownership
OBIDENITY® remains authoritative for governed ownership whereapplicable.
Reference and Event Boundary
A Value Reference may reveal information outside the currentEvent Boundary.
VARM shall not independently expand the event.
Therefore:
Reference Linkage ≠ Event Boundary Expansion.
Potential Event Boundary issues shall be referred to TREBS.
Reference and Event Relationship
The same Value Reference may appear across several governedevents.
This does not establish that the events are identical.
Therefore: Shared Value Reference ≠ Same
Event
TRERLS remains authoritative for Event Relationships.Reference and Taxation
A governed reference identifies the value under subsequentgovernance.
It does not determine its tax treatment.
Therefore:
Governed Value Reference ≠ Taxable Value
Governed Value Reference ≠ Tax Base
Governed Value Reference ≠ Tax Liability
A jurisdiction may later interpret the referenced value accordingto applicable law.
Multi-Jurisdiction Reference Stability
A principal benefit of a jurisdiction-neutral Value Reference isthat multiple taxation systems can evaluate the same governed
value without TREGA™ redefining it for each jurisdiction.
The model is:
One Governed Value Reference
→ Jurisdiction A Evaluation→ Jurisdiction B Evaluation
→ Jurisdiction C Evaluation
The legal conclusions may differ.
The governed reference remains stable.
Reference Interoperability
VARM should enable different operational systems to referconsistently to the same governed value structure without
requiring identical internal data models.
This supports: ERP integration; banking interoperability; payment
reconciliation; blockchain integration; tax-engine integration;
marketplace interoperability; AI-agent systems; machine
economies; auditability; and cross-border data exchange.
Interoperability concerns the reference.
It does not require uniform legal interpretation.
Reference Traceability
VARM shall preserve sufficient information to reconstruct: wherea reference originated; which source identifiers exist; how
references were linked; which equivalence decisions were made;
which hierarchy exists; whether normalization occurred; whether
substitution occurred; whether versioning occurred; whether
corrections occurred; whether ambiguity existed; and whether
conflicts remain.
VATM later governs the complete Value Association traceability
structure.
VARM owns traceability necessary specifically for the integrity
of the Value Reference.
Governance States
VARM may represent states including:Reference Ready
Reference Under Governance
Reference Distinguished
Reference Linked
Reference Normalized
Reference Equivalent
Reference Non-Equivalent
Reference Composite
Reference Substituted
Reference Versioned
Reference Ambiguous
Reference Conflicted
Reference Unresolved
Governed Value Reference Established
These states describe reference governance only.Governance Requirements
VARM implementations shall ensure that: every admitted ValueAssociation Candidate can be referenceable; source references
remain preserved; governance-level references can be
distinguished from source identifiers; multiple source references
can be linked where legitimate; reference equivalence is not
assumed from superficial similarity; reference non-equivalence
can remain visible; aggregate and component references can be
distinguished; composite value structures can be represented;
reference hierarchies can be preserved; normalization does not
alter underlying value meaning; reference stability can survive
source-identifier changes; substitutions remain traceable;
version relationships remain reconstructable; corrections do not
erase governance history; ambiguity remains visible; conflicts
remain visible; missing source references do not automatically
eliminate legitimate value; technical uniqueness is not treated
as economic uniqueness; blockchain identifiers are not
automatically treated as complete economic references;
machine-generated references can be governed; Value State remains
separate; Value Change remains separate; Event Participation
remains separate; ownership remains separate; Event Boundary
remains protected; Event Relationships remain separate; and tax
valuation remains downstream.
Governance Logic
IF VAIM establishes a Value Association Candidate, THEN VARMshall determine how the relevant value can be stably referenced.
IF a valid upstream governed Value Reference already exists, THEN
VARM should preserve and consume that reference rather than
unnecessarily recreate it.
IF multiple source identifiers represent the same underlying
governed value, THEN they may be linked under a common Governed
Value Reference where equivalence is sufficiently supported.
IF similar references cannot be shown to represent the same
value, THEN they shall remain distinct.
IF one aggregate reference contains materially distinct value
components, THEN appropriate reference granularity shall be
preserved.
IF a source identifier changes while the underlying value remains
continuous, THEN a new governed value shall not be created solely
because of the identifier change.
IF reference equivalence remains ambiguous or conflicted, THEN
that state shall remain visible.
IF a reference reveals a possible Event Boundary problem, THEN
VARM shall refer the issue upstream rather than expand the event
independently.
IF the Value Reference is sufficiently governed, THEN it shall
proceed to VACM for Value Change Association governance.
Minimum Implementation Framework
A minimum VARM implementation should support:Governed Event Reference
The governed event to which the Value Reference structurerelates.
VAIM Candidate Reference
The originating Value Association Candidate.Governed Value Reference Identifier
The stable governance-level reference.Source Value Reference
The original operational or governed identifier.Source System
The system or governance source providing the reference.Reference Type
The applicable reference category.Reference Granularity
The level at which the value is being referenced.Parent Reference
A higher-level reference where a hierarchy exists.Component Reference
A lower-level reference where components exist.Equivalent Reference Set
Other references governed as representing the same underlyingvalue.
Reference Equivalence State
The qualification of equivalence.Normalization State
Whether reference normalization occurred.Substitution State
Whether one reference replaced another.Prior Reference
The historical reference where substitution or versioning occurs.Version State
The applicable reference version relationship.Reference Confidence
The qualified confidence attached to the reference structure.Ambiguity State
Whether reference meaning or equivalence remains ambiguous.Conflict State
Whether materially conflicting reference relationships exist.Traceability Reference
The information required to reconstruct the reference governance.Governance State
The current VARM state.Handoff State
Whether the reference is ready for VACM.Governance Outputs
VARM may produce: Governed Value Reference; Source ValueReference Map; Multi-Source Value Reference Link; Governed
Reference Equivalence; Governed Reference Non-Equivalence;
Composite Value Reference; Value Reference Hierarchy; Value
Component Reference; Normalized Value Reference; Reference
Substitution Record; Reference Version Record; Reference
Correction Record; Reference Confidence State; Reference
Ambiguity State; Reference Conflict State; Reference Traceability
Structure; and the principal output:
Governed Value Reference Set
This output proceeds to VACM.Critical Distinctions
Value Reference ≠ Value Determination
Governed Value Reference ≠ Tax Valuation
Source Value Reference ≠ Governed Value
Reference by Default
Canonical Reference ≠ Source Reference
Replacement
Same Amount ≠ Same Value Reference
Same Currency ≠ Same Value Reference
Same Participant ≠ Same Value Reference
Same Timestamp ≠ Same Value Reference
Similar Description ≠ Same Value Reference
Multiple References ≠ Multiple Values by
Default
Reference Similarity ≠ Value Equivalence
Aggregate Reference ≠ Component Reference
Composite Reference ≠ Single Indivisible
Value by Default
Reference Normalization ≠ Value
Transformation
Source Identifier Change ≠ New Governed
Value by Default
Reference Substitution ≠ Value Replacement
by Default
New Reference Version ≠ New Value by
Default
Reference Correction ≠ Historical Erasure
Reference Ambiguity ≠ Permission to Assume
Equivalence
Reference Conflict ≠ Permission for
Convenient Linkage
Missing Source Reference ≠ No Value
Unique Technical ID ≠ Unique Economic
Value by Default
Transaction Hash ≠ Economic Value
Reference by Default
Token ID ≠ Governed Economic Value by
Default
Wallet Address ≠ Value Owner
Payment Identifier ≠ Complete Event Value
Reference by Default
Invoice Reference ≠ Single Value Reference
by Default
Machine-Generated Reference ≠ Invalid
Value Reference
Value Reference ≠ Value State
Value Reference ≠ Value Change
Value Reference ≠ Participant
Determination
Value Reference ≠ Ownership
Reference Linkage ≠ Event Boundary
Expansion
Shared Value Reference ≠ Same Event
Governed Value Reference ≠ Taxable Value
Enterprise Application
VARM creates a stable reference layer across fragmented economicsystems:
VAIM — Governed Value Association
Candidate Set
→ ERP Reference / Banking Reference / Payment Reference /Blockchain Reference / Machine Reference / VFM® Reference
→ VARM — Value Reference Governance
→ Governed Value Reference Set
→ VACM — Value Change Association
→ VASM — Value State Association
→ VATM — Value Association Traceability
→ Governed Value-Associated Event
This allows multiple systems and later jurisdictional tax engines
to refer to the same governed value structure without requiring
identical source identifiers or identical legal interpretations.
Use Case 1 — Banking, ERP, and Commerce Reference Reconciliation
A multinational merchant completes a commercial event.
The ERP system records an order ID and several invoice lines.
The payment provider records a payment transaction ID.
The bank records a settlement reference.
The marketplace uses its own transaction identifier.
The same economic value is therefore represented differently
across four systems.
At the same time, the invoice contains several value components
that must not be collapsed into one reference.
VARM establishes governed links between the relevant source
references, preserves component-level granularity, distinguishes
genuinely separate values, and creates stable Governed Value
References for subsequent TRVAS governance.
The result can be consumed by tax, audit, compliance, and
reconciliation systems without treating any single operational
identifier as the complete economic truth. Use Case 2 —
Blockchain and Autonomous Machine Transaction
An AI agent purchases computational capacity from an autonomous
digital service.
The event produces an agent transaction ID, smart-contract call,
blockchain transaction hash, token-transfer reference,
compute-allocation ID, and settlement record.
These technical references describe different parts of the same
economic activity, while one blockchain transaction may also
contain unrelated protocol operations.
VARM preserves each source reference, determines which references
can legitimately be linked, maintains appropriate granularity,
and establishes the Governed Value Reference structure required
by TREGA™.
It does not treat the transaction hash as the economic value
itself, determine who owns the digital asset, or decide the tax
treatment of the transaction.
Canonical Boundary
VARM owns the establishment, differentiation, normalization,linkage, equivalence, non-equivalence, hierarchy, granularity,
stability, substitution, versioning, correction, ambiguity,
conflict, interoperability, and reference-specific traceability
of value references admitted into TRVAS governance.
VARM does not identify initial Value Association Candidates,
govern the underlying Value Lifecycle, determine Value State,
determine Value Change, establish Value Change Association,
establish Value State Association, own complete Value Association
traceability, determine Event Participation, redefine Event
Boundary, determine Value Ownership or entitlement, establish
accountability or liability, or determine taxable value, Tax
Base, Tax Liability, or another jurisdiction-specific tax
consequence.
Its governance ends when the relevant value possesses a
sufficiently stable, distinguishable, and reconstructable
Governed Value Reference for subsequent Value Change Association
governance.
Canonical Handoff
VAIM — Governed Value Association
Candidate Set
→ VARM — Governed Value Reference Set→ VACM — Value Change Association Governance
Canonical Closing Statement
VARM establishes a stable reference to value without allowingidentifiers, records, transaction hashes, invoice numbers, or
system-specific representations to become substitutes for the
governed value itself.
Different systems may describe the same value differently, and
similar records may describe different values. Reference
governance preserves that distinction. Value Reference ≠ Value
Determination.
Governed Value Reference ≠ Taxable Value.