HRSM-F — Harm Resolution State Module
OOF® Origin Open Foundation®
Independent Methodological Authority
Canonical Definition
The HRSM-F — Harm Resolution State Module governs how the currentResolution condition of governed Harm is identified, represented,
maintained, and reassessed after Recovery and Residual Harm have been
sufficiently governed for Resolution evaluation.
HRSM-F determines whether the Harm lifecycle is not ready for Resolution,
ready for Resolution evaluation, pending Resolution, conditionally
resolved, resolved, uncertain, degraded, or no longer legitimately
resolved because the Harm condition or Resolution basis has materially
changed.
It establishes the transition:
Governed Harm Recovery & Residual Harm State → Resolution Readiness →
Resolution Condition Assessment → Resolution State Formation → Resolution
State Maintenance → Governed Harm Resolution State
Its central question is:
What is the current Resolution state of the governed Harm, and is that
state sufficiently supported by current Harm reality?
- Operational Role
The preceding HRRHS lifecycle establishes:
what recovered
and:
what Harm remains.
HRSM-F establishes:
where the Harm currently stands in relation to Resolution.
Its operational role is:
to convert the governed post-Recovery Harm condition into an explicit
Resolution State without prematurely treating Recovery, Residual Harm
stability, administrative completion, or absence of immediate Harm
manifestation as Resolution.
The foundational distinction is:
Resolution State must represent the Harm lifecycle—not the status of an
external process associated with it.
- Position Within HRFS
The HRFS governance flow is:
Resolution State → Resolution Criteria → Closure → Reopening → Finality
HRSM-F governs the first stage:
Resolution State
It receives principally:Governed Harm Recovery & Residual Harm State
It produces:Governed Harm Resolution State
for the next HRFS stage:HRCM-F — Harm Resolution Criteria Module
- Governed Object
The primary governed object is:
Current Harm Resolution Condition
HRSM-F does not primarily govern:Recovery
Residual Harm
Closure
or:Finality
It determines the current relationship between the governed Harm conditionand Resolution.
Therefore:
Post-Recovery State ≠ Resolution State by Default
- Foundational Resolution State Principle
The foundational rule is:
A Harm Resolution State must reflect whether the governed Harm has
actually reached a condition capable of supporting Resolution—not whether
surrounding activities or processes have ended.
Therefore:
Process Ended ≠ Harm Resolved
Intervention Ended ≠ Harm Resolved
Recovery Completed ≠ Harm Resolved
- Resolution Readiness
Before a Harm can enter Resolution evaluation, its lifecycle must be
sufficiently mature for the question of Resolution to be meaningfully
asked.
Resolution Readiness may depend on materially relevant understanding of:
current Harm State
Mitigation
Recovery
Residual Harm
continuing Harm pathwaysdependencies
and:
uncertainty
Resolution Readiness is itself a governed condition.
- Resolution Readiness ≠ Resolution
A Harm may be sufficiently understood for Resolution evaluation without
satisfying Resolution requirements.
Therefore:
Resolution Ready ≠ Resolved
This distinction prevents readiness from becoming an implicit Resolution
decision.
- Resolution Not Ready
A Harm may remain:
Resolution Not Ready
where materially relevant lifecycle conditions remain insufficientlygoverned.
Examples may include:
Recovery still materially indeterminate
Residual Harm insufficiently understood
Harm still actively propagating
current Harm Boundary materially uncertainor:
post-Harm reality insufficiently established
This state means Resolution evaluation would be premature.
- Resolution Pending
Resolution Pending may apply where the Harm has entered Resolution
evaluation but a legitimate Resolution determination has not yet been
completed.
Therefore:
Resolution Evaluation Started ≠ Resolution Established
Pending status preserves the distinction between process and outcome.
- Conditionally Resolved State
A Harm may reach:
Conditionally Resolved
where Resolution is legitimate only while specified materially relevantconditions remain satisfied.
Conditions may include:
continued support
monitoring
dependency maintenance
protective controls
environmental conditions
or:
defined Harm stability requirements
Canonical distinction:
Conditional Resolution ≠ Unconditional Resolution
- Resolved State
A Harm may be represented as:
Resolved
where the current governed Harm condition sufficiently supports Resolutionunder the applicable Resolution basis.
Resolved does not mean:
the Harm never occurred
all consequences disappeared
every subject returned to the pre-Harm state
Residual Harm is zero
or:
Finality has been reached
Therefore:Resolved Harm ≠ Harm Erased
- Resolution Uncertain
A Harm Resolution State must remain uncertain where materially relevant
uncertainty prevents a stronger determination.
This may arise from:
conflicting Recovery information
uncertain Residual Harm
latent Harm
insufficient observation
unstable dependencies
distributed conditions
or:
uncertain current Harm reality
Canonical principle:
Uncertainty must remain visible when it materially affects Resolution.
- Resolution Degraded
A previously stronger Resolution State may degrade where its supporting
condition weakens.
For example:
Resolved → Resolution Degraded
may occur where:
Residual Harm begins increasing
Recovery deteriorates
dependencies weakenor:
previous assumptions become materially uncertain
Resolution State must follow current Harm reality.
- Resolution Lost
A previously resolved Harm may cease to satisfy the basis supporting
Resolution.
Conceptually:
Resolved → Resolution Degraded → Resolution Lost
or directly:
Resolved → Resolution Lost
where a material change is sufficiently significant.
Therefore:
Historical Resolution ≠ Permanent Current Resolution
- Resolution State Model
HRSM-F may represent the Harm through states such as:
Resolution Not Ready
Resolution Readiness Established
Resolution Pending
Conditionally Resolved
Resolved
Resolution Uncertain
Resolution Degraded
or:Resolution Lost
These states are methodological representations of the Harm lifecycle.They are not administrative workflow labels.
- Resolution State and Residual Harm
Residual Harm may coexist with multiple Resolution States.
For example:
Residual Harm + Resolution Not Ready
Residual Harm + Conditional Resolution
or:
Residual Harm + Resolved
may each be legitimate depending on the governed Harm condition.
Therefore:
Residual Harm Exists ≠ Resolution State Predetermined
- No Residual Harm and Resolution State
The absence of identified Residual Harm does not automatically establish
Resolution.
Other conditions may remain unresolved.
Therefore:
No Residual Harm ≠ Resolved
HRSM-F evaluates the broader Harm Resolution condition.
- Resolution State and Recovery
Recovery materially informs Resolution State but does not determine it
automatically.
A Harm may have:
Substantial Recovery + Resolution Not Ready
or:
Partial Recovery + Conditional Resolution
where legitimate.
Therefore:
Recovery State ≠ Resolution State
- Resolution State Without Historical Restoration
Resolution does not require:
Post-Harm State = Pre-Harm State
A new stable post-Harm condition may support Resolution.
Canonical principle:
Resolution is determined by the legitimacy of the current Harm condition,
not by restoration of historical reality.
- Resolution State and Continuing Harm
Where Harm remains actively:
emerging
accumulating
compounding
propagating
or:
cascading
a strong Resolution State may be inappropriate.
The relevant earlier HAGA™ lifecycle governance must remain active.
Therefore:
Active Harm Progression ≠ Resolved Harm
- Resolution State and Harm Stability
Stability may support Resolution.
But:
Stable Harm ≠ Resolved Harm
Stability answers whether Harm is materially changing.
Resolution asks whether the Harm lifecycle has reached a legitimate
resolved condition.
- Resolution State and Harm Absence
No currently observable harmful effect may support Resolution evaluation.
It does not establish Resolution by itself.
Therefore:
No Immediate Harm Observed ≠ Resolved
Latent, intermittent, distributed, or insufficiently observed Harm may
remain.
- Resolution State and Dependencies
A Resolution State may depend on continuing external conditions.
Material dependencies should remain visible.
Examples may include:
ongoing treatment
technical support
protective infrastructure
environmental controls
human supervision
or:
operational safeguards
Therefore:
Resolved Under Dependency ≠ Dependency-Free Resolution
- Dependency Failure
Where a material dependency supporting Resolution fails, the Resolution
State must be reassessed.
Conceptually:
Conditionally Resolved + Dependency Failure → Resolution Reassessment
The state may remain valid, degrade, or be lost depending on the resulting
Harm condition.
- Resolution State and Adaptation
Adaptation may support a legitimate post-Harm condition.
However:
Successful Adaptation ≠ Resolution by Default
HRSM-F must preserve whether Harm itself has reached a
Resolution-supporting condition.
- Resolution State and Compensation
Compensation does not determine Resolution State.
Therefore:
Compensated Harm ≠ Resolved Harm
and:
Uncompensated Harm ≠ Unresolved Harm by Default
The objects are separate.
- Resolution State and External Closure
External processes may close while the Harm remains unresolved.
These may include:
incident management
claims
legal proceedings
insurance cases
internal investigations
service tickets
or:
administrative processes
Therefore:
External Closure ≠ Harm Resolution State
- Resolution State Scope
Every Resolution State must correspond to a defined Harm scope.
The scope may specify:
which Harm
which subjects
which objects
which Harm Boundary
which domains
which locations
and:
which materially relevant conditions
Canonical principle:
A Resolution State without scope can conceal unresolved Harm.
- Composite Resolution State
Composite Harm may contain different Resolution conditions.
For example:
Component A → Resolved
Component B → Conditionally Resolved
Component C → Resolution Not Ready
The composite state must preserve materially relevant differences.
Therefore:
Resolved Component ≠ Resolved Composite Harm
- Collective Resolution State
Collective Harm may resolve differently across affected subjects or
subgroups.
A majority may recover while a materially significant subgroup remains
unresolved.
Therefore:
Majority Resolution ≠ Collective Resolution
HRSM-F must preserve material distribution.
- Distributed Resolution State
Distributed Harm may have different Resolution States across:
locations
systems
organizations
infrastructure components
or:
environments
Therefore:
Local Resolution ≠ Distributed Resolution
- Cross-Domain Resolution State
Harm may span multiple domains with different Resolution conditions.
For example:
Physical → Resolved
Operational → Resolved
Financial → Resolution Pending
Environmental → Conditional Resolution
The complete Resolution State must preserve these differences where
materially relevant.
- Resolution State Aggregation
Where an aggregate Resolution State is required, aggregation must not
erase material unresolved conditions.
Therefore:
Strong Aggregate Resolution ≠ Universal Resolution
The methodology must preserve the components that materially constrain the
aggregate conclusion.
- Resolution State Persistence
A Resolution State remains legitimate only while its material basis
remains sufficiently valid.
Therefore:
Resolved Once ≠ Resolved Forever
Before Finality, Resolution remains capable of change.
- Resolution State Reassessment
Reassessment may be required where:
Recovery regresses
Residual Harm changes
Residual Harm increases
latent Harm becomes manifestnew materially relevant Harm is discovered
the Harm Boundary changes
dependencies fail
new evidence materially changes the Harm condition
or:
the previous Resolution basis becomes unreliable
- Historical Resolution State
Resolution State history must remain preserved.
A Harm may move through:
Resolution Not Ready → Resolution Ready → Pending → Resolved → Degraded →
Lost
and later:
Pending → Resolved
The current state must not erase legitimate historical states.
Therefore:
Current Resolution State ≠ Complete Resolution History
- Resolution State Traceability
The Resolution State should remain traceable to the relevant HAGA™
lifecycle.
Conceptually:
Governed Harm → Harm State → Containment → Mitigation → Recovery →
Residual Harm → Resolution State
This prevents Resolution from becoming an isolated declaration detached
from the Harm it claims to resolve.
- Evidence Boundary
Evidence may support the Resolution State.
But:
Evidence ≠ Resolution State
ADIT® governs evidence and auditability.
HRSM-F governs what the supported information means for the Harm
Resolution condition.
- Validation Boundary
VALIDOS™ may validate relevant evidence, methods, or determinations.
But:
Validated Basis ≠ Resolved Harm by Default
Validation supports the governance determination.
It does not replace it.
- Operational Reality Boundary
ORA™ may establish relevant current operational reality.
HRSM-F determines what that reality means for the Harm Resolution State.
Therefore:
Operational Stability ≠ Harm Resolution by Default
- Accountability and Liability Boundary
Resolution State must remain independent from:
accountability
responsibility
and:
liability
Therefore:
Accountability Established ≠ Harm Resolved
Liability Settled ≠ Harm Resolved
Harm Resolved ≠ Liability Resolved
- Prediction and Simulation Boundary
Predicted future Resolution does not establish current Resolution.
Likewise, simulated Recovery or Resolution does not establish actual
Resolution.
Therefore:
Predicted Resolution ≠ Current Resolution
Simulated Resolution ≠ Operational Resolution
- Resolution State Handoff
HRSM-F does not itself establish the complete criteria by which Resolution
becomes legitimate.
It determines the current Resolution condition and prepares that condition
for:
HRCM-F — Harm Resolution Criteria Module
The handoff is:Governed Harm Resolution State → Resolution Criteria Evaluation
This preserves:
State ≠ Criteria
- Minimum Implementation Framework
A minimum HRSM-F implementation requires exactly eight capabilities.
- Resolution Readiness Determination
Determine whether the governed Harm lifecycle is sufficiently mature for
Resolution evaluation.
- Resolution State Formation
Represent the current Harm as Resolution Not Ready, Ready, Pending,
Conditionally Resolved, Resolved, Uncertain, Degraded, Lost, or another
methodologically equivalent governed state.
- Harm-State & Residual-Harm Integration
Maintain sufficient relationship between the Resolution State and current
Harm, Recovery, and Residual Harm conditions.
- Dependency & Conditional Resolution Governance
Identify materially relevant dependencies and distinguish conditional from
dependency-free Resolution conditions.
- Composite, Collective, Distributed & Cross-Domain State
Governance
Preserve materially different Resolution conditions across components,
subjects, groups, locations, systems, and Harm domains.
- Resolution Scope & Traceability
Maintain explicit Resolution scope and sufficient traceability to the
governed Harm lifecycle.
- Reassessment, Uncertainty & State History
Preserve uncertainty, trigger reassessment when Harm reality materially
changes, and maintain material Resolution State history.
- Governed Output
Produce a traceable Governed Harm Resolution State suitable for Resolution
Criteria governance. 45. Use Case 1 — Stable Residual Harm With Resolution
Readiness
A system experiences significant Harm and subsequently undergoes
Containment, Mitigation, and Recovery.
Most operational capability is restored, while a limited, stable,
well-understood Residual Harm condition remains.
HRSM-F does not automatically classify the Harm as unresolved merely
because Residual Harm exists.
It may establish:
Resolution Readiness Established
and transfer the Harm condition for Resolution Criteria evaluation.The governing principle is:
Residual Harm may remain while the Harm lifecycle becomes ready for
Resolution.
- Use Case 2 — Previously Resolved Harm Deteriorates
A governed Harm reaches Resolution and remains stable for a period.
Later, Recovery regresses and previously stable Residual Harm materially
increases.
HRSM-F does not preserve:
Resolved
merely because that state was historically legitimate.It may transition:
Resolved → Resolution Degraded → Resolution Lost
and return the condition to appropriate active governance.
The governing principle is:
A Resolution State remains legitimate only while it continues to represent
current Harm reality.
- Governance Requirements
HRSM-F requires that:
- Resolution State remain distinct from Recovery, Residual Harm,
Closure, and Finality; - Resolution Readiness precede stronger Resolution
determinations where materially required; - Resolution Readiness remain
distinct from Resolution; - external process completion not determine Harm
Resolution State; - Residual Harm not automatically determine the
Resolution State; - absence of Residual Harm not automatically establish
Resolution; - Recovery State remain distinct from Resolution State; -
historical restoration not become a universal Resolution requirement; -
active Harm progression remain incompatible with unsupported strong
Resolution claims; - Harm stability not automatically establish
Resolution; - absence of immediate manifestation not automatically
establish Resolution; - materially relevant dependencies remain visible; -
dependency failure trigger reassessment where appropriate; - adaptation
not automatically establish Resolution; - compensation remain separate
from Resolution State; - Resolution State remain explicitly scoped; -
composite, collective, distributed, and cross-domain differences remain
visible; - aggregate Resolution not erase materially unresolved
conditions; - Resolution State remain capable of degradation or loss; -
reassessment follow material Harm reality changes; - historical Resolution
States remain preserved; - Resolution remain traceable to the Harm
lifecycle; - evidence, validation, Operational Reality, accountability,
liability, prediction, and simulation remain methodologically distinct; -
the output remain suitable for Resolution Criteria governance.
- Governance Logic
HRSM-F applies the following logic:
Is the governed post-Recovery Harm condition sufficiently established?
If no:
→ Resolution Not Ready
If yes:
→ determine:
Is Resolution evaluation methodologically appropriate now?
If no:
→ maintain:
Resolution Not Ready
If yes:→ establish:
Resolution Readiness
Then evaluate the current condition:Does active Harm progression continue?
What Recovery has been achieved?
What Residual Harm remains?
Is the Harm condition stable?
Are material dependencies present?
Is the condition distributed or composite?
What uncertainty remains?
Based on the current governed basis, establish the applicable:
Resolution State
Then ask:Is the Resolution State conditional?
Is it dependent on continuing support?
Does it apply to the entire Harm Boundary?
Are any components, subjects, locations, or domains materially unresolved?
Has the state changed since the previous determination?
If material change occurs:
→ reassess.
If the state remains sufficiently supported:
→ preserve it.
Then produce:
Governed Harm Resolution State
for:HRCM-F — Harm Resolution Criteria Module
Throughout:Ready ≠ Resolved
Recovery ≠ Resolution
Residual Harm ≠ Unresolved by Default
Stable ≠ Resolved
External Closure ≠ Resolution
Historical Resolution ≠ Current Resolution
State ≠ Criteria
- Governance Outputs
HRSM-F may produce:
Governed Harm Resolution State
Resolution Readiness State
Resolution Not Ready State
Resolution Pending State
Conditional Resolution State
Resolved Harm State
Resolution Uncertainty State
Resolution Degraded State
Resolution Lost State
Resolution Dependency Condition
Resolution Scope
Composite Resolution State
Collective Resolution State
Distributed Resolution State
Cross-Domain Resolution State
Resolution Reassessment Trigger
Resolution State History
Resolution State Traceability
and:Resolution Criteria Readiness State
The principal output is:Governed Harm Resolution State
- Critical Distinctions
Post-Recovery State ≠ Resolution State
Process Ended ≠ Harm Resolved
Intervention Ended ≠ Harm Resolved
Recovery Completed ≠ Harm Resolved
Resolution Ready ≠ Resolved
Resolution Evaluation Started ≠ Resolution Established
Conditional Resolution ≠ Unconditional Resolution
Resolved Harm ≠ Harm Erased
Historical Resolution ≠ Permanent Current Resolution
Residual Harm Exists ≠ Resolution State Predetermined
No Residual Harm ≠ Resolved
Recovery State ≠ Resolution State
Active Harm Progression ≠ Resolved Harm
Stable Harm ≠ Resolved Harm
No Immediate Harm Observed ≠ Resolved
Resolved Under Dependency ≠ Dependency-Free Resolution
Successful Adaptation ≠ Resolution
Compensated Harm ≠ Resolved Harm
External Closure ≠ Harm Resolution State
Resolved Component ≠ Resolved Composite Harm
Majority Resolution ≠ Collective Resolution
Local Resolution ≠ Distributed Resolution
Resolved Once ≠ Resolved Forever
Current Resolution State ≠ Complete Resolution History
Evidence ≠ Resolution State
Validated Basis ≠ Resolved Harm
Operational Stability ≠ Harm Resolution
Liability Settled ≠ Harm Resolved
Predicted Resolution ≠ Current Resolution
Simulated Resolution ≠ Operational Resolution
State ≠ Criteria
- Canonical Boundary
The HRSM-F — Harm Resolution State Module governs the current Resolution
condition of governed Harm after Recovery and Residual Harm have been
sufficiently represented for Resolution evaluation. It governs Resolution
Readiness, Resolution State formation, Conditional Resolution, Resolution
uncertainty, degradation and loss, Resolution scope, material
dependencies, composite, collective, distributed and cross-domain
Resolution conditions, state reassessment, history, and traceability.
HRSM-F does not define the complete Resolution Criteria, perform Harm
lifecycle Closure, govern Reopening or Finality, independently govern
Recovery or Residual Harm, determine general causation, accountability,
responsibility, liability, claims, compensation, value consequences,
audit, validation, prediction, simulation, or jurisdiction-specific legal
resolution.
- Canonical Closing Statement
Resolution is not a reward for completing a process and not a label
attached to the end of an intervention. It is a governed state of the Harm
itself.
That state may become ready, remain pending, depend on continuing
conditions, become legitimate, degrade, or be lost as Harm reality
changes.
HRSM-F keeps Resolution attached to that reality before any criteria are
allowed to convert it into lifecycle Closure.
A Harm is ready to move toward Resolution only when its governed
condition—not the surrounding process—supports that transition.